Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zancho-San

Zancho-San

Not notable --fvw* 23:34, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)

• Delete incredibly, even less notable than the above. Cdc 23:38, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• None of these pages met the criteria for speedy deletion. They were correctly listed. It is an abuse of admin power to delete articles that do not meet the speedy criteria without the consensus of the community. Dr Zen 00:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Criterion 4. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:09, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Nope. It clearly had a context. The context might not have been "notable" but it had one.Dr Zen 01:15, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • That would be a matter of interpretation. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:29, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
      • Yes. Differences in interpretation are the reason we have VfD.Dr Zen 01:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • And VfU. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:53, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
          • It's rather unusual, but I find myself agreeing with Dr Zen here: You really should be more careful with what you VfD, some of your recent speedies have clearly violated WP:CSD. --fvw* 02:01, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)
            • I don't believe that *any* of my recent deletions have. But that's just my interpretation. Out of respect for other interpretations of those criteria, I've reverted myself on some of them. I still feel that my SD of them was appropriate however. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 02:20, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. I think it should be speedied, but in the case that it's not, VfD is the only other option. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 02:30, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. This is (unfortunately) not a speedy candidate. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 17:03, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, not quite a speedy, not notable. Wyss 19:34, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)