Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan/Collaboration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconJapan Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 21:09, April 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Okay, here we go[edit]

Let's discuss how we want to structure this collaboration. I'd like to keep it as simple as possible in order to not make it a burden to run it. Ideas? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 09:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved all associated pages[edit]

I've moved all the associated pages I could find so they all reside here now. I've also fixed all the redirects so there aren't any double redirs. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vital articles"[edit]

The page Wikipedia:Vital articles lists a thousand articles and "serves as a guide for featured articles." Several are related to Japan:

These would make good candidates for collaborations to bring them toward Good Article or Featured Article status.

Fg2 02:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a good start. We can also use Category:Top-importance Japan-related articles (40 articles), Category:A-Class Japan-related articles (11 articles), and Category:GA-Class Japan-related articles (21 articles) for articles to work on. Especially important would be Top-importance articles that are either A- or GA-class:
So, that's two more, making a total of 9 articles from Wiki Vital and Japan Top. I think with the others in these three categories we have plenty that we could work on. Should we rank them? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranked[edit]

Here's my quick and dirty ranking of the articles above (the order in which I think they should be worked on):

Anyone else have any suggestions for an order? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Shinto is a really great candidate, because it's already a very well-researched, well-written article (though a bit long, as I recall)... and only lacks citations. And since there's also a WikiProject Shinto, making that the collaboration might attract notice and bring a few of those people over here to help us get things going. Dekimasu 16:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]