Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Llamas
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Carried out at 00:23, 3 Jan 2005 by User:Neutrality
Closing the discussion. Rossami (talk) 03:55, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Pink Llamas[edit]
It's a group of fans of one TV show who hate another, totalling sixty-eight people. Not-encyclopedic. Tuf-Kat 00:01, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, a cross between vanity and advertising. Rje 00:46, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: "Our cartoon is so much better than your cartoon! It sux!" Yeah. Not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a web guide nor advertising medium. Geogre 04:00, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, I'm RotfY (rolling on the floor yawning) Hoary 04:57, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to have the potential to become a comprehensive article on this subject, which is my understanding of what "encyclopaedic" actually means, rather than being a synonym for "notable".Dr Zen 05:30, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. A vanity article about a fun club for one TV show, with the weird twist that they don't like some other TV show. I don't think TV show fan clubs can be encyclopedic unless it becomes a cultural phenomenon like the Trekkies. If a fan club is notable, it probably has more than 68 members and a website. --BM 12:14, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Sordid vanity. Phils 12:31, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. --fvw* 14:40, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity, I don't see it has having much potential. --Kevin 14:49, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: DCEdwards1966 18:37, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.