Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Tsekhman

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:56, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Tsekhman[edit]

I believe this is not notable Svest 03:27, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

I believe this is a credible source

Keep, This is Daniel Tsekhman and currently my biographer is making this site for me, it is not complete and still needs to be worked on. I can assure you all the information is accurate.--Daniel51a 04:45, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems alright to me - Bubba

65.92.191.246 or Bubba, tell us why you believe so and what the sources are! Svest 04:17, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

Delete, the only google hits for Daniel Tsekhman appear to be for a student at Vaughan Road Academy. Not notable. Megan1967 05:02, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, let your biographer Bubba contact our biographers Mr. Daniel51a, and make sure you relax. No worries. ;-) Svest 05:49, May 6, 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}
Delete hoax/vanity/injokruft. Ben-w 07:52, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obvious nonsense. Mirror Vax 11:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everything above. Samaritan 13:11, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity nonsense -Rjo 19:13, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - vanity - Tεx τ urε 16:41, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.