Talk:Han'er language

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Miya Noriko 宮紀子, "Mongoru ga nokoshita 'hon'yaku' gengo--kyūhon Rōkitsudai no hakken ni yosete--Jō" モンゴルが遺した「翻訳」言語―旧本『老乞大』の発見によせて― (上), Nairiku Ajia gengo no kenkyū 内陸アジア言語の研究, Vol. 18, 2003, pp. 53-96

This paper challenges conventional theories and convinces me. I decide to wait ant see the latter half of the pater scheduled for this year. --Nanshu 02:34, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

to today's Mandarin[edit]

Mention what parts of this ended up in today's Mandarin. Does mei3 become men0? e.g., ta1men0: them. Is this where de0 (wo3de0: mine) comes from? --Jidanni 2006-04-15

I guess not, as the possessive is reversed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.7.126 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct title?[edit]

Surely "haner" is not a possible word. 汉儿 is pronounced either hànr or hàn'ér. Which is it? — Gulliver ✉ 14:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's an English word, not a transcription, although it comes from a transcription. It's no less correct than 麥克風 is in Chinese.--BaldsRTouching 06:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to "Han'er" by a literal transcription of 汉儿. If anyone asserts that it is an "English word" and not merely a transcription mixed with translation, then at least one reliable source would be nice. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 00:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolian romanisation[edit]

I am not familiar with romanisation systems for pre-modern Mongolian, but is luɤa perhaps supposed to be luɣa? Wikipeditor 12:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]