Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percy Delarosa

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:35, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Percy Delarosa

Article reads in its entirety: Percy Delarosa is a made-up personality, who sends spam to Cricket Web e-mails. This doesn't seem to be patent nonsense, vanity, etc., so we must vote on its Wikiworthiness [yawn]. Perhaps this will thrill the author. Oh, before I forget: Delete, for reasons that I can't be bothered to give. (So flay me!) -- Hoary 08:36, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)

PS at 03:00, 2005 Mar 27, 203.187.228.35, who wrote the original article (and whose pattern of edits elsewhere is somewhat, ah, idiosyncratic), deleted the text in the article. So if I remember the rules correctly, it now qualifies as a speedy. -- Hoary 03:54, 2005 Mar 27 (UTC)

• Delete fictional spammers aren't notable. Especially if you don't tell who imagined them. Mgm|^(talk) 09:46, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:45, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, orphan nn. -- Infrogmation 20:01, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy or otherwise. Chris 19:08, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Sirkumsize 22:33, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, empty article. Megan1967 04:23, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.