Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohl's Frozen Custard

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 21:31, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Kohl's Frozen Custard[edit]

If they're notable, they probably don't want to be known for this. ~~POV issues.~~ -- Longhair | Talk 13:12, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Longhair | Talk 13:12, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- People should know about this place. Also, what "POV issues"? Guthrie 13:18, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I take the POV issues back. I quickly read "served and wound up in a pint of ice cream". My fault. Article still needs an expansion though. Just covering all the negative aspects of the workplace is POV. -- Longhair | Talk 13:30, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A family business founded in 1996 which so far consists of six ice cream stands, at least one of which is not even open yet. This is way below our usual standards for inclusion of businesses. Except for their website and the news article, I can find nothing verifiable to say (and the news article is WikiNews stuff, not really encyclopedia material). Delete. Rossami (talk) 00:15, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for disgruntled employees. --Angr/_comhrá 05:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO this is another case for a "Wait 6 months and review" -- either they'll become famous over these incidents, in whuich case a brief entry is probably worth it, or they'll fade away again, in which, delete. But I gather that Wiki rules don't allow such a vote. --Simon Cursitor 07:34, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There is such a rule. Delete it now, if it becomes notable, it can be recreated further down the road. Rick K 07:47, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
keep' it is interesting and verifiable and also encyclopedic too Yuckfoo 23:27, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Should have been written on Wikinews, but not worth the effort and delay of a transwiki. —Korath (Talk) 01:20, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 04:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.