Talk:Clepsydra (diatom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COMMENT[edit]

Another hoax from 24.7.43.194 on a subject worth an entry Wetman 06:22, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Removed PROD. Not a hoax.[edit]

Well, the header says it. -ikkyu2 (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pennales[edit]

Native Cited

"The Tasmanian protists comprise several distinct and geographically restricted taxa (Croome el al. 1987, Pipes el al. 1989, Vyverman el al. 1997, sub m). We describe a new species of amphoroid diatoms, Clepsydra truganiniae, which shows striking similarities in cell morphology and cytology to the section Psammamphora of Amphora sensu lato, consisting of marine, mainly subtidal species. We re-examined two taxa of Psammamphora, Amphora arenaria and A. obtusa, provide an updated description of their morphology and propose to transfer them to the new genus Clepsydra. The taxonomic position of this new genus and the potential relationships with other groups of pennate diatoms, in particular with the recently described new genus Eunophora (Eunotiophycidae), are discussed."

This should probably be in a larger categorical group of "Pennate Diatoms" in a list of cited types. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AcheronSS (talkcontribs) 10:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad idea; I'm sitting on the fence on this merge proposal. To do it systematically would also mean merging each of the Diatom genera to either Pennales or Coscinodiscophyceae; is that worthwhile? Klbrain (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clepsydra (diatom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]