User talk:RiseAbove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for uploading Image:PadrinoFiftyBucks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Civility[edit]

Regarding this edit: Please read Wikipedia's policy on WP:CIVIL. Insulting other users is against our policy, and threats against other users are patently unacceptable. If you continue to act beligerently towords other users, you may be temporarily blocked from editing. --InShaneee 19:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your reasons and/or ability to carry out threats, being disrespectful at all to other users is against policy. --InShaneee 19:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(The below was posted to Inshaneee's talk page):

Thanks![edit]

I received this comment from you on my talk page not long ago:
"[T]hreats against other users are patently unacceptable. If you continue to act beligerently towords (sic) other users, you may be temporarily blocked from editing."
I just wanted to say how effective your admonition not to threaten people was, especially since it was accompanied by a threat. Even though my putative "threat" was nothing more than a quotation from the The Juggernaut Bitch video itself (which I can now only assume that you have not even seen), I can understand how people might be put in fear that I might credibly "hit [them] with [their] own pimp" if I see them on the street. This is made even more credible by the fact that I have no idea what any of these people look like, nor where they live, nor what their names are. I can see why you're such a highly regarded editor. Oh, it's spelled "towards" by the way. "A" and "O" are so close on the keyboard, I can see how you got them confused.RiseAbove 19:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
and sic is spelled sick [sic] right? 'pedia's a pretty sikh [sic] place to learn stuff. Ka-zizzlMc 19:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what up homey[edit]

I'v had my stuff targeted by the deletion squad, too. I'v gone through some pretty rebellious phases and I'm probably not done but you'r gonn wann watch the calling people whores. It sucks sometimes, but realize what wikipedia IS, and realize the wikipedia.org is not the only place where you can have a wiki where everyone can collaborate on whatever kind of content you think is valuable. given the right circumstances, finding or creating a new wikisite can be easy. there are hundreds of legit, sizable ones out there. that said, keep up the generally good work of challenging the authority and the status quo and lame people who are quite simply haters. rock out with your cock out Ka-zizzlMc 20:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PadrinoDemand.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PadrinoDemand.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PadrinoDemand.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PadrinoDemand.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]