Talk:Language planning

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Untitled[edit]

'Language planning' has nothing to do with constructed languages and should have its own content.

Bathrobe 04:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a rough stub on 'language planning' based on this article: [1]. Also this article: [2].

There is obviously a lot of overlap between language planning and language policy, but it seems they should be kept conceptually distinct.

Any contributions or opinions welcome.

Bathrobe 06:00, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Having created this page, and having added further information, I am painfully aware that it is open to charges of plagiarism as most of the material is reproduced verbatim (although in edited form) from other sites. It needs rewriting so that these charges no longer apply.

Bathrobe 23:47, 15 May 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Sole official language: English in the UK?[edit]

There are conflicting sources for whether English is official in the UK (see [3] at List of countries where English is an official language vs other articles which cite it as not being official). I thus changed it to Turkish in Turkey, which as far as I know is a better example. 143.117.157.60 (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Language planning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140326223349/http://www.journalofwestafricanlanguages.org/Planning.aspx to http://www.journalofwestafricanlanguages.org/Planning.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote wrongly attributed[edit]

I have never edited Wikipedia before and don't want to make a mistake, but the quote attributed to Cooper is definitely from Haugen (1959). You can also see this in the publication by Cooper that is cited. Gemmaanna (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Photos[edit]

I was wondering if it would be possible to add some images to this page? This might be relevant if there was more discussion of how language planning has helped with language revival, especially with Wampanoag. Skmpark (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]