This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
On both the "ICBM" page and "Comparison of ICBMs" page, distances are in kilometers. Yet, WP:MOSCONVERSIONS states "Where English-speaking countries use different units for the same quantity, provide a conversion in parentheses:". WP:MEASUREMENT states that using SI units exclusively is only required for scientific articles. These clearly are not scientific articles, e.g., physics, electromagnetic theory, etc. So, why aren't miles available here? Could someone please add the "convert" templates to do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.0.181 (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
K-4 missile has maximum range of 3,500km not 5,000km as cited in many resources so shouldn't it be moved from this ICBM page to IRBM page. only K-5 and K-6 have range over 5000km Mayank Prasoon (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Restored reference links to Encyclopedia Astronautica[edit]
@SchmiAlf has misrepresented the rfc, which concluded “There appears to be a consensus that this is a valuable resource, but which lacks editorial oversight, contains errors and is no longer updated…caution needs to taken in using the source.” The rfc found that no consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply on the reliability of the site, which includes “It may be necessary to evaluate each use of the source on a case-by-case basis while accounting for specific factors unique to the source in question.” Given the issues with this source I am reverting SchmiAlf's change pending consensus for inclusion.Ilenart626 (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is Israel really “known” to have operational ICBMs? The lead contains a list of countries which are “known to possess operational ICBMs.” If so, I feel like there should be a citation next to Israel’s name on the list as Israel has repeatedly declined to comment on whether or not they possess any nuclear weapons and the whole program remains a secret. Jackvoeller (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
