Talk:War reparations

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical / World War I / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Why not Israel?[edit]

Why is Israel not on the list? The entire nation was created at the end of WWII to make up for Hitler's atrocities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.146.19 (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By whom, do you think? — LlywelynII 07:39, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reparation/Reparations[edit]

Why War reparations and not War reparation? The latter term is usually used to describe a particular reparation of a set of reparations. The former term is substantially more common (see google-fight). Kingturtle 07:08, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

the article is used to adress what exactly the term War reparations means, as well as some of the most studied (i think) war reparation terms.Ursper 20:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Territories[edit]

Territores awarded to Poland weren't part of war reperations. I removed the sentence.

The war reparations paid by Finald to the Soviet Union in 1045 - 1952 were momentous and Finalnd was the only country who fulfilled its war repation duties. Could a historian look at this and edit the page accordingly, if considered valuabel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.46.189 (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the numbers and spelling, anyway. 2A00:23C7:E287:1901:79A7:A66E:AB26:9BBA (talk) 22:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Reparations[edit]

I deleted the sentence dealing with US reparations for Vietnam and Korea, because there was no source. Please reinsert it if a source is found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.24.2 (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism - what about justifications?[edit]

I visited this page hoping to understand the logic behind reparations. Disappointingly for me, it has plenty of detail on what reparations are, but little on why they are imposed.

My thinking is as follows: Surely it is enough to have kicked the other country's butt? Why keep the conflict front-of-mind by insisting on an arbitrary payment?

The governments that impose these reparations must have justified their actions somehow. If anyone knows what these justifications might be, please add something to this article.

Thanks, 196.212.146.185 (talk) 12:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cost money to "kicked the other country's butt" as a taxpayer I want no country's butt kicked if I have to pay for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.34.107.174 (talk) 02:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In principle, war reparations are founded upon the idea that the losing party started the war and ought to pay for it, both to make up for the victor's costs, and to deter future aggression. In reality, of course, they may be mere extortion by the stronger power, which, having conquered its adversary, finds itself in a position to demand whatever tribute the vanquished power can be compelled to pay. I don't have time to find a source for this, or I'd put it into the article. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Standard[edit]

The article asserts,

Some war reparations induced changes in monetary policy. For example, the French payment following the Franco-Prussian war played a major role in Germany's decision to adopt the gold standard. . . . The 230 million silver taels in reparations imposed on defeated China after the Sino-Japanese War led Japan to a similar decision.

There should be some explanation as to how war reparations affected the decision to go onto the gold standard. Did the sudden influx of silver from reparations lower the market value of silver coin, requiring a switch to a more stable standard? Whatever the case, would somebody please find a source that explains this phenomenon, and put the explanation into the article? J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United States[edit]

There should be greater coverage of the United States, particularly the Alabama Claims against the United Kingdom for its supposed assistance to the Confederate cause during the Civil War. The UK had been neutral but international arbitration still ended with an agreement to fairly substantial compensation. For awhile, it looked like it could've ended with American annexation of British Columbia etc. which is why we bought Alaska in the first place. It's also a case study for other countries (including Russia) for demanding US payments for involvement in their own civil wars. — LlywelynII 07:39, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source for forced labor in the US after WWII? The given source is about Indochina, and is by an unreliable author, anyway. 2A00:23C7:E287:1901:79A7:A66E:AB26:9BBA (talk) 22:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

China[edit]

Ditto the 19th century wars against the Qing Empire and the compensations demanded. — LlywelynII 07:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Evidence: suspect a false claim?[edit]

Article currently states "4,000,000 German POWs and civilians were used as forced labor (under various headings, such as "reparations labor" or "enforced labor") in the Soviet Union, France, the UK, Belgium" but there is no evidence given of any forced labour of Germans in the UK after the war. Indeed, the government could not impose forced labour since slavery has been illegal in the UK for much longer than it has in America. 2.31.166.175 (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And the US. Where was this? 2A00:23C7:E287:1901:79A7:A66E:AB26:9BBA (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Reparations Agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Reparations Agreement" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Reparations Agreement. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 12#Reparations Agreement until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. b uidhe 12:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]