Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aged

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 12:56, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Aged

Dicdef that has already been transwikied to Wiktionary. --Allen3 ^talk 20:43, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

• I was going to say "redirect to aging, but that doesn't say anything about aging in cheese, so I'll switch to keep and expand. Must be something to do with oxidation. Kappa 21:15, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Carnildo 23:27, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There's a cheese page for information about cheese. Ben-w
• Delete, why should aged only refer to cheese and not to wine, whiskey, tequila, etc.? RickK 00:02, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • That's why it should be expanded, not redirected to cheese. Kappa 00:35, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand as important concept in production of food. Capitalistroadster 02:16, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to aging, which should be a disambiguation page for the process in humans/other animals and the process in foods (e.g. wine, whiskey, cheese, etc.). Meelar (talk) 02:18, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Aging. Megan1967 05:49, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to aging. And pass me the cheese please. Radiant_* 09:10, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect -- to Aging - Longhair | Talk 04:18, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Concur with redirect voters. Past tense verbs (alone) are useless as an article but better as a redirect. --SuperDude 05:35, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.