Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continental Flight 11

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 20:09, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Continental Flight 11[edit]

Not encyclopædic. --W(t) 03:21, 2005 May 8 (UTC)

Delete, just some nonsense. DariuszT 03:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not encyclopaedic. -- Mariocki ^TALK 03:47, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --FCYTravis 03:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
At best an attempt to learn English by posting patent nonsense to Wikipedia. (For the record, entire text since creation: "Going to the limit in transcontinental flight try Flight 11. When boarding talk to the stewardess or the cabin crew to determine their impact on your flight. Ask for a window seat so as to observe best what is going on outside the plane. There is no better way to observe large continental experiments than from the air. Have you seen Chicago from the air? How about San Francisco? Air views are different. Try one!") But as the talk page points out, this Continental Flight 11 was extremely notable. Speedy the nonsense, request and keep the bombed plane. Samaritan 04:05, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As noted by Samaritan, there ought to be a legitimate article about Continental Flight 11. Unfortunately, the current content is totally irrelevant. Delete, possibly speedily. Aerion //talk 05:59, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Forward to BJAODN. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 07:48, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.