Talk:Givat HaMoreh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Change name & link "Giv'at Ha-More" term to the article!!![edit]

Dealing only with an obscure biblical name when there is a modern reality there, is quite poor. Pls. smb. at least create the right linkage for Givat HaMoreh, Giv'at ha-More, etc. - all variations thereof. Thanks. .... or, create a separate page for the biblical term, IF smb. decides it cannot be securely identified with the modern site. Whichever. As it is now, it's BAD.Arminden (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)ArmindenArminden (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary moved from the article:[edit]

Is this entry necessary for a general interest encyclopaedia? Just because Easton's public domain 1800s Christian encyclopaedia has thousands of entries doesn't mean that this encyclopaedia needs to do so. If we followed this kind of micro-entry format, we'd end up with thousands of tiny entries for Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc. I totally agree that Wikipedia needs many comprehensive articles on religion, but Wikipedia is not meant to be a religious dictionary or encyclopaedia. All I am asking is that we make sure that our entries are comprehensive, and not unnecessarily fractured into micro-entries. Sub-entries should only be created when there is a compelling need to do so. RK

Wikified[edit]

I did a little wikification work and cleanup, but more cleanup definitely needs to be done. This page could possibly be turned into a disambig, what with all the different definitions of the word. I am continuing on with wikification of other articles (there's a huge backlog) ... good luck! JubalHarshaw 18:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

took out the dismabig area to a different page.--sin-man 09:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moreh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]