Talk:Lego Star Wars: The Video Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Developers etc[edit]

The credit for developing, publishing and distribution is a little confusing to me. All versions seem to be published by Travelers Tales except for the GBA version which was developed by Griptonite Games. Eidos Interactive seems to have published the game, however, no source is clear on the role of Giant Entertainment. I've seen it listed as a publisher (IGN) and I've seen it mentioned as "Developed and Published by" (official site). Anyone know for sure? K1Bond007 22:53, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

The official website is linking to them on "developed and published", and from their website:

Based in Beaconsfield, England, Giant Interactive Entertainment Ltd. is the only publisher to specialize exclusively in computer and video games for young gamers and their families. LEGO® Star Wars™: The Video Game is Giant's first step on the road to becoming the leading publisher in this market. But I agree this is too confusing. Most likely, they are the publishers in Europe, and the states get Eidos to do it. wS 10:08, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The back of my PC game box (UK PAL) states the game is "Published by Giant Interactive Entertainment Ltd." Rusty595 (talk) 14:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grevious & C-3PO[edit]

General Greivious and C-3PO are on the cover of the game, but they aren't playable on the GBA game. What's up with that? User:Khang|Khang 15:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Grievous and C-3PO are playable characters in the other versions of the game, as well as NPC's in the GBA version, so I believe that to maintain continuity with the box art of the other versions, they were included on the box for the GBA game. Aericanwizard 21:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually both characters are unlockable via codes. C-3PO does nothing, but I haven't done Greivious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.162.40 (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Zam Wesell[edit]

Weren't Sev'rance Tann and Zam Wesell different people? Tann was a Confederate general in the game Star Wars Galactic Battlegrounds and Wesell was a bounty hunter in Episode II. Besides, Zam Wesell was killed in the beginning of Episode II, while Tann was killed by the clone army later on. Cowami, Worshipper of Qeueue 01:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're right. Someone got the name wrong. NapoleonB 23:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Level Section[edit]

I tried to do my best to improve the section--does it seem passable now? --Evan1109 06:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up[edit]

This article needs a serious clea-up. The level by level walkthrough is completely unnecessary. The Secret Level especially, where it practically describes the entire level section by section. Most of this falls under WP:NOT (Wikipedia is not a game guide). I'll give it a week to see what people thing, and then set about tiding it myself. +Fin- 15:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmph, this is the second time someone's gone ahead and edited all the shite out of it (happened on Age of Mythology too) - think I'll just edit away from now on... +Fin- 13:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just took a load out. Fixed up the Playable Characters thing so its actually correct now, I cleaned the GBA characters up, but its really poorly written, I don't have the GBA game so I don't know what's right or wrong. But anyway, like you said, this page seriously needs a lot of work. Gran2 21:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The synopsis follows the contents of the movie, not the games. The cutscenes are very much abbreviated versions of the movie, but with more humor and sight-gags inserted to tell the story quickly. 24.18.54.49 02:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting[edit]

I've redone some of the formatting since the text became cluttered up BS Guus 07:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move per WP:MOS-TM and WP:NCON. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game → Lego Star Wars: The Video Game – The brand name Lego is lowercase, even though the script font may look all uppercase. waffle iron talk 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Oppose The proper name is "LEGO"(despite some people here insisting it be spelled "Lego", and LucasArts(publisher of the game" spells it "LEGO Star Wars: The Video Game". It doesn't matter what LEGO is changed too since the video game spells it with capital letters. TJ Spyke 05:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Wikipedia style guidelines recommend that, for brand names typically printed in allcaps, they be spelled out in normal caps. Lego, Spam, Geico, Transformers, and so on. I don't always agree with that guideline myself, but for sake of consistency all of the other Lego articles are spelled "Lego", not "LEGO". Move & redirect. --Stratadrake 12:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Need to follow Wiki guidelines. Zotdragon 15:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per Stratadrake. EVula 17:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment, it does'nt matter what the brand name is, the GAME name was spelled LEGO. Are you trying to say that if LEGO change the spelling of their name to lEgo that this article would be moved as well? No, because the publisher of this game spelled it LEGO and I don't understand why you people voting yes would want the game article to be moved from the CORRECT name to an INCORRECT name. TJ Spyke 21:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose Not the correct name of the game. Edgecution 23:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Relevant Wiki guidelines are --

--Stratadrake 00:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • Comment, LEGO is the common usage, and how come CNET isn't at Cnet then? TJ Spyke 01:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • There's to be a discussion about that on the CNET Talk page from back in June (earlier than this survey). Now if Google were case-sensitive, we could do a 'Net search and compare whether LEGO or Lego is more common around the Web. Though, for a quick comparison about just how important this issue is, I suppose we could argue that since comic strips usually print their dialogue in ALLCAPS, and game boxes typically use ALLCAPS anyway, should we quote comic strips and game titles in ALLCAPS for the sake of matching how it is printed? No. --Stratadrake 12:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • PS: Capitalization came up at least three times on Talk:Lego, in addition the Lego article itself mentions that the "lego" trademark has become a common word for all interlocking brick toys. --Stratadrake 12:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks); “Lego” is not an acronym. --Rob Kennedy 19:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, yes it is. LEGO stands for "Leg Godt", which is Danish for "good toy". TJ Spyke 22:24, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • That is better described as an abbreviation or portmonteau than the common conception of an acronym. And this was already a subject of some debate on the Lego talk page. Lego is also an anacronym as well -- it is so commonly as an ordinary word that the original meaning is all but forgotten and special capitalization is no longer applied. --Stratadrake 08:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GBA[edit]

Can I use a screenshots from GBA version to the polish star wars encyclopedy [www.ossus.pl/biblioteka Ossus Library]--Prymonek 22:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't see why not, but you should check with whoever uploaded them first, and also check their copyright status. Gran2 22:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Legostarwarsthevideogame.jpg[edit]

Image:Legostarwarsthevideogame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XBOX[edit]

Princess Leia is in the game.....I'm just heading off to bed now, but when I wake up I'll snap a photo with my webcam and upload it....unless I'm wrong due to sleep deprivation Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 09:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm responding to a suspended user's post, but there was a valid concern, namely that the list was attempting to be complete while leaving out some entries. I've updated it to match the PC/XBox version character list, but if the list is going to stay it needs to note which characters exist in which versions (DS being the only special case, I think). I conducted some coherence editing while I was at it, but it still needs work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.112.245 (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ten belien fireflies were at my door some came in my window there friends followd them and I sang a song for them I like to make my selef beleave the planet earth teerns slowly it's hard to say that I brather stay awake when i'm asleep but every thing is never it seem's when I fall asleep —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.188.80 (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem regarding release dates not beeing consitant across all articles[edit]

I've noticed that the releas date for the game stated in this article does not corrospond with the date stated in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Episode_III:_Revenge_of_the_Sith or this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Star_Wars_%28video_game_series%29

List of playable characters[edit]

The list of playable characters needs to be (re)added to this article. Lego Star Wars video game series no longer has its own page so the link to a list of characters no longer gives you that information. 220.253.2.34 (talk) 01:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lego_Star_Wars:_The_Video_Game&oldid=1217656674"