Talk:Green liberalism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CJTheReader.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bellamelodia, Villap95. Peer reviewers: Zoe Mara Talamantes, Bengutman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Green neoliberalism section[edit]

"The reason stated is that liberalism is repulsed by authoritarian politics, which the Green Parties do not explicitly reject."? Can someone please explain this? - Jeandré, 2004-05-04t18:45z

The link to "Green Parties World Wide" seems questionable. Green != green liberal. E.g. for Sweden, the listed party here is the left-wing Miljöpartiet, while Centerpartiet, who actually call themselves both "green", "green vote" ("grön röst"), "liberals" and "green liberals" is not listed. If the link is to stay, its scope needs to be explained since it does not have a NPOV but probably will be understood as having one. 130.237.57.80 (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the claims made are vague due to words such as "very," "seem to," "somewhere between," "slightly less," etc, which leave room for debate or different interpretations. Most of the political claims are made in the middle sections, however, there are no references made. (Also, the third link of references does not work.) Much more information can be added about how green neoliberalism came about and how it became a global sensation. Although the section is titled "philosophy," only the first sentence explains what green neoliberalism is. The philosophy and ideologies of green neoliberalism (what it exactly is) can be expanded upon. Sharonjchoi (talk) 05:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, though it appears changes have been made. However, whoever added information on green neoliberalism did a very poor job and showed overwhelming bias against green neoliberalism to the point it seems questionable. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. There are numerous violations. Also it's hard to determine if these sources wall within Wikipedia guidelines [[1]]. This needs to be corrected. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the topic; I'm just identifying this based on language, tone, subject matter, sources and so forth.--CriticalThinking26 (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I requested quotes from the cites over a month ago but as none have been provided I deleted the section Chidgk1 (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Improvements[edit]

Hey, this is a good start! Although, there are a few potential improvements I see. For one, the information provided needs more citations as it's unclear where the information is coming from. Additionally, it would be helpful to have more sources in general to gain a wider perspective on the topic. Also, the link to the 3rd online source seems to be broken. I attempted to find it elsewhere online but was unsuccessful. One more suggestion would be to create a separate section on the history of the green liberalism movement including it's origin and main actors to provide a little more context. Chriswilson (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland[edit]

Why is there a link to Bright Future, which is not described as green on its wikipedia page, but none to Viðreisn, which is? Pkoppenb (talk) 08:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good start. I strongly recommend adding aspects of green liberalism that go beyond its philosophical component. For example, how has it been used to inform practice, policy or group and individual based actions? Additionally, I would suggest adding the various critiques, viewpoints and way green liberalism has been engaged with as a discourse. This would demand incorporating more sources to allow for a more balanced view point. Zoe Mara Talamantes (talk) 06:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Zoe Mara Talamantes 10:33, 11/23/2017[reply]