Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educrat

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 01:56, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Educrat[edit]

Dicdef, with an inherently NPOV title and (I'd argue) inherently NPOV definition. Can't imagine how this could be expanded. --Calton 04:10, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Polemical dicdef; no potential to become NPOV. Szyslak 05:56, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
~~Weak~~ Strong delete - ~~Could perhaps have some relevance, but I'm sure this isn't the title.~~ Homeschooling covers this far more adequately. Smoddy | ειπετε 22:00, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The term has some circulation, although since it's just "education bureaucrat" smashed together there's not much to say about it. Delete this rant, anyway. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:16, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Poverty pimp, while similarly perjoritive, survived VfD because it was in common use and could be defined without ranting. Delete pending someone dempnstrates both. jdb ❋ 04:48, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.