Talk:Yeon Gaesomun

Yeongae Somun

his surname wasn't Yeon, it was two-syllable surname; Yóngae and his first name was Somún. during the threekingdoms period, most of koreans did not have single-syllable surnames like now, they had two or even three-syllable surnames, such as Úljí, Húkchí and so on.

Well, 210.55.227.203, I'm not sure. I can't find any information that directly states which was his family name and which his first name. However, I note that his sons included Yeon Nam-geon (연남건/淵男建) and also Yeon Nam-saeng (연남생/淵男生), who defected to Tang. This would seem to suggest that Yeon was the family name; otherwise surely they would be known as Yeongae Namsaeng and Yeongae Namgeon. If you have any evidence that Yeongae was the family name, please let me know. -- Visviva 13:30, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Korean only started having surnames during Goryo Dynasty, prior to Goryo period, Koreans didn't have surnames. However, they did used some sort of clan titles and given names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Consoleman (talk • contribs) 09:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

yeon gaesomun

it has been confirmed that yeon's surname was infact yeon, however, it is widely known both in korea and japan, that his name pronounciation in Goguryeo language is 'Iri Kasumi', where Iri is Yeon, and Kasumi is Gaesomun.

Source? -- Visviva 00:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

New Book of Tang[1] gave his personal name as Gaesomun. --Nlu (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

In thesedays his name would have sound more like Kasumen, hence his name was indeed Gaesomun in modern korean pronunciation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs) 06:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

five swords

did you know? yeon carried five swords. I got it from this one book, but can't remember the title.Odst 04:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I remember reading that too. It was part of an official Chinese record when Tang or Sui, I can't remember, sent an emissary to Goguryeo. Yeon Gaesomun was seen by that emissary to be "a hideous violent man," bearing 5 swords at once. But he carried five swords probably to intimidate the emissary, plus all those five swords werent really for fighting -- they were the traditional HwanDuDaeDo swords with a ring on the butt of the hilt. They were given by the king as a proof of a special position someone held in military or in court. Remember, Yeon Gaesomun practically was the ruler in Goguryeo by that time? He had all the important official positions to himself. That is why one man is seen carrying so many swords.

In later period of Gogureyo and three kingdom period of Korea, sword represented today's badges something like the Cop badge. This practice were forbidden during Koryo period, however it was symbolic, Yeon's five swords represented five powerful clans of Gogureyo also showing he was the one who represented all five political clans.

thanks

Thanks to whoever added that photo... that makes him look like a charismatic man. (He was, actually) Odst 04:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

what photo? Don't see any pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Consoleman (talk • contribs) 09:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Korea history's edits

Korea history (talk · contribs), your point is taken in that Chinese texts may not be neutral. However, you have cited no source in support of your edits. Korean history texts are acceptable citations. Korean fiction is not. Please cite some actual history in support of your edits. Further, simply eliminating the traditional Chinese accounts -- which are supported by traditional Chinese historians who had little reason to embellish a prior dynasty's achievements -- and replacing them with your version is a blatant violation of WP:NPOV. See Trung Sisters for an example of how an NPOV placement of multiple versions of the same campaign might be written. --Nlu (talk) 18:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I've looked at the Samguk Sagi. It doesn't support your edits either. The Joseon Sangosa's overglorification of Korean history has been noted by Korean scholars themselves. Don't rely on it as your only source. Cite something more ancient and/or reliable. --Nlu (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Meanwhile, for Korean editors there -- I must say that my interests have been piqued enough. If any of you know how I can buy either an English or a Traditional Chinese translation of the Joseon Sanggosa (if one exists in either language), I would appreciate a pointer. (I assume that it was written in Hangul; if there is a Hanja edition, that will suffice even though there may be some grammatical constructs or vocabulary that I don't understand.) --Nlu (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Tone of Article

Making comparisons between 7th century Korea and 1930s Europe is a bit much (re. reference to Chamberlain and Hitler). This entire article is in fact veering into very subjective territory and almost picking a fight. I'd keep to the bare facts with passing reference to controversy only. Straitgate 12:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

{{cleanup-tone}} will be added, but please go ahead and dig in and help.  :-) --Nlu (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Done :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.246.40.54 (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yeon Gaesomun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160603115730/https://www.aoewd.com/index.php to https://www.aoewd.com/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)