Talk:King Kong (1933 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleKing Kong (1933 film) was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 27, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 2, 2012.
Current status: Delisted good article

'Chang' Producers Reunited For 'Most Dangerous Game' By LOUELLA O. PARSONS[edit]

  • https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/11801012/
  • "Ernest Schoedsack and Meriam Cooper, travelers, film experts and producers of the never-to-berforgotten "Chang," are together again. Their reunion takes place at Radio studios, where the combine to produce "The Most Dangerous Game," famous short story. Perhaps you've read "The Most Dangerous Game," voted the ninth best story in the entire world by one of the magazines, and included in every anthology of best short stories."
  • 'Chang' Producers Reunited For 'Most Dangerous Game' By LOUELLA O. PARSONS Motion Picture Editor. Universal Service. Copyright, 1932, by Universal Service. Inc.
  • continues with discussion of film financing. ... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright problem[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 11:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

King Kong inspired the modern day legend of the Loch Ness Monster.[edit]

"It is believed that King Kong inspired the modern day legend of the Loch Ness Monster."

Nonsense. Who believes this? Tales of the Loch Ness Monster pre-date the release of King Kong. Tales of monsters in the lake go back to medieval times. The first photo of the creature was taken the same year the movie was released, but it's doubtful the film had made its way to Scotland by then. 2601:643:8D00:970:4901:BF0C:C666:A5D1 (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before reading this talk page, I spotted that same sentence and made some changes to it. "It is believed," without any more detail, is a perfect example of weasel words. It also suggests a level of certainty (although still incomplete) that is unjustified, as 2601... points out. "Who believes this?" indeed. So I put in the name of the single person, as far as I can tell, who believes it and reduced it to suggesting it. I also put in another link to a source much closer to Loch Ness than New Zealand is. Dgndenver (talk) 12:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFI list nominations should not be added[edit]

AFI list nominations should not be added per MOS:FILMCRITICLIST

There is a comment, "DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION" next to the villains nomination. YordleSquire (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]