Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 28 May 30 >

May 29[edit]

Category:Star Wars Trade Routes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:16, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just merged all the stub articles that were in this category into Star Wars trade routes, in accordance with WP:FICT. The category's now an empty orphan that I don't see any real growth potential in. Bryan 23:54, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Good work. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well done! And delete as a matter of cleanup. Radiant_* 11:10, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Discordian games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:22, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Inclusion in this category seems to be wholly arbitrary. -℘yrop (talk) 17:53, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete; the information is useless in this form. It could go in an article if necessary. KVenzke 19:09, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is no need to put a plug for Discordianism into any game that is not explicitly Discordia-based. DenisMoskowitz 18:16, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Politics substubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:16, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Unused and unnecessary. Andros 1337 17:29, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • I thought this was deleted ages ago! Get rid of it! Grutness...wha? 06:58, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is no such thing as a substub any more. Delete. Radiant_* 07:20, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, indeed. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • DeleteHiding 17:33, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Business jets[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:27, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Empty and redundant - there is Category:Business aircraft Pibwl 11:06, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • COMMENT: I wouldn't say it's redundant. A jet is a type of aircraft. Just because you have a Starship, which is a business aircraft, a prop driven affair, doesn't mean you have the same as a LearJet 45 or like the new Embraer VLJ, even if the Starship is the coolest, sleekest looking airplane around. And a Bell 404 isn't even an airplane, it's a chopper.

Perhaps you can argue it's unnecessarily specific, though it is an aviation sector, and a large and significant one at that. 132.205.45.110 01:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:McCoy[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:32, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A cat of everybody in the 'pedia who has the (admittedly rather common) last name, McCoy. Suggest listifying as categorizing people by name is not really an informative classification.. Radiant_* 09:22, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Savoir-faire[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:30, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This is a poorly named category which is also redundant with Category:Procedural knowledge. -- Beland 06:26, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Television stations in San Deigo / Tijuana[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:34, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The category's title has a typo: it should be "Diego". And apparently Category:Television stations in San Diego / Tijuana was created a few hours ago -- so I moved all the relevant articles into there. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy rename. Radiant_* 09:22, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, this is a speedy-rename (see top of CfD page), but delete, if necessary. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Charities of Canada[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 15:36, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This newly created category is a duplicate of the older Category:Canadian charities. Kurieeto 04:47, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Nova Scotian ice hockey players, Category:Nova Scotia boxers, and Category:Nova Scotia curlers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 15:38, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

i created these cats but now am sure they're too restrictive and that the two to four members that populate each simply should be placed in Category:Nova Scotia sportspeople, a cat with just three members that would come to have 12, if i remember right -Mayumashu 02:00, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support merging, good idea. Radiant_* 09:22, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. I agree. In any case, either one or two of them is/are misnamed (it should either be Nova Scotia or Nova Scotian, not a combination). Grutness...wha? 09:51, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, good move. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 20:20, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Soviet civil aircraft[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:40, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Empty. Subcategory of Category:Soviet and Russian civil aircraft. Redundant (will apply to all civil aircraft in Soviet and Russian category except those made after 1990. In other words, most). →Iñgōlemo← talk 00:31, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Soviet airliners 2000-2009[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Soviet union was gone long before this decade. Empty. →Iñgōlemo← talk 00:37, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Soviet civil aircraft 2000-2009[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:42, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Empty category. The Soviet Union was gone by 1992, so it will never fill. →Iñgōlemo← talk 00:39, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Revolution games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:43, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Empty category. Video game system to which this category is referencing is not the final name of the system. All articles previously listed in this cat were either made into redirects or deleted per VFD. K1Bond007 02:18, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, but not prejudiced against re-creation when the final name is selected. James F. (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_May_29&oldid=1121905482"