User talk:JanSuchy

Avoiding original research

Please do not base assumptions off of court filings, as you did on 2K Czech and related articles, as this constitutes original research. For example, Take-Two Interactive, the holding company, announced the completion of the acquisition in January 2008, as is covered by several reliable sources on 2K Czech's article. Assuming that the acquisition had been completed in December 2007 because the legal position of an affiliated company had changed then is not a proper source for the change's finalization. Also note that 2K Czech became a subsidiary-by-management of 2K Games, not Kush Games, which is another subsidiary of the same company. This corporate management structure is also documented in several of the cited sources. Referencing your edit from yesterday, where you claimed that Kush Games' ownership was still ongoing; Kush Games (aka 2K Los Angeles) shut down in 2008, its legal entity being the only remnant, so claiming that company still existed through 10 years of inactivity just because it is the legal parent of another since-disestablished company is not a good argument. When inserting or updating content in articles, please use reliable, secondary sources instead of court filings. Lordtobi (✉) 21:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, it took me some time to understand what "defunct = End date|df=yes|2017" means. Regarding the date of acquisition, I made the change after reading the following sentence in FORM 10-K of T2 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 (page 77): In December 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of 2K Czech, formerly known as Illusion Softworks... Regards, JanSuchy (talk) 22:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of If the Pig Had Wings

The article If the Pig Had Wings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to pass notability requirements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ČSD Class 477.0 has been accepted

ČSD Class 477.0, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Arnika (NGO) site

Hi @JanSuchy (Dobrý den :-)), thank you for your thanks. However Jamiebuba moved that article into waiting mode (AfC) what is a bit discouraging, I have to say because I spent many hours on finding references etc. Can you suggest any way forward? What to change in Draft:Arnika (NGO) in order to get it ready for English wikipedia? I found sevaral references which have more than one para about Arnika but it does not seem to be enough. Můžeme samozřejmě klidně komunikovat i česky, případně po mailu. Líbí se mi témata, která jste zpracoval. Držím palce! ... a obdivuji odolnost :-). FurtKofein (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi FurtKofein, I do not have any suggestions. I was looking for sources regarding Arnika stance on mercury cell electrolysis but found only press releases and news articles copy-pasting these press releases. JanSuchy (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @JanSuchy, thank you for that. I used a different keywords at scholar.google.com and found quite good ones. So, I hope this issue will be solved. It will still take some time to work it out as I don't have only wikipedia :-). Let see. Thank you for help anyway. FurtKofein (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @JanSuchy, I think I have almost finished revision of the draft article. However being rather new on Wikipedia, I am not sure about its "tone", if it is enough encyclopedic mode or not and also if it is O.K. to have that number and type of references. May I ask you to have a look and suggest any changes or so? This is a link: Draft:Arnika (NGO). Thank you in advance. FurtKofein (talk) 21:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi FurtKofein, I have opened annual report 2022 and read the financial part, as there are three legal entities and many projects, I was not sure how to summarize the content in one or two sentences. Regards --JanSuchy (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @JanSuchy, yes, I know. I had similar problem, to I left part on financing as it is not needed at this stage, I believe. Also, annual report 2022 would not reflect situation 10 years ago and probably would be considered as reliable source for wikipedia. Thank you for checking that. FurtKofein (talk) 19:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for mistakes in my English, here is the correction: ..., so I left part ... and in later text I wanted to say, that annual report probably would NOT be considered as reliable source of information for wikipedia. FurtKofein (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)