Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distractress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Distractress[edit]
Neologism (only four unique google hits). The original content ("see mattress") suggests that it was intended as a joke. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 00:56, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Del but is neologism a CSD criterion? —msh210 02:28, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. Megan1967 04:19, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Neologisms aren't CSD, but extremely short, uninformative articles with no context are. Speedy delete. Gazpacho 05:07, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- zero in-links; if neologism, poor one, implies gender, but defintion 'skirts' the issue --Simon Cursitor 07:06, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - original work - Tεxτurε 16:32, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.