Talk:Genestealer

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Warhammer 40,000Wikipedia:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Template:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Warhammer 40,000 articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Additions from White Dwarf[edit]

User Jesse Mulkey has pasted in (and beautifully formatted) large sections of White Dwarf. Even with accreditation, surely this is straight copyright violation? See the Copyright FAQ. We would need to extract the key points and rewrite them. Removing for now - the content can be still accessed from page history. --Air 12:52, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic?[edit]

I agree with 151.204.6.44 - at the very least this article (and all the other 40k articles) should be scaled back. Can you imagine the Brittanica going into this much detail about a tiny subsection of the totally fictitious lore associated with a table-top game? I'm very glad that this information has been put on the net, but this is not the place to put it in this detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.201.121 (talk) 00:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous user 151.204.6.44 has twice added this tag to the article. I'm reverting again as this article seems perfectly justified. Note the many other articles in the category Warhammer 40,000 species - why are these articles not under similar attack? --Air 12:52, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think they are. 151.204.6.44 seems to have some sort of chip on his/her shoulder. "Wikipedia is not a fan site" apparently. The IP

Considering how games workshop and their fiction is now seriously branching out into other areas(video games, books, comics etc) I don't see how it can be classed as a niche fan thing. --Silveralex 28 June 2005

Genestealer in Rogue Trader[edit]

Games Workshop have helpfully reprinted the Genestealer and Tyranid articles from Rogue Trader. --Air 07:54, 20 May 2005 (UTC) http://us.games-workshop.com/games/40k/tyranids/articles/genesis.htm[reply]

Ovipositor[edit]

A line in this article implied that the Alien jaw-within-a-jaw was an ovipostitor; that is incorrect. The ovipositor was the egglaying apparatus attached to the Alien queen's posterior. God, I'm a nerd. :) Fernando Rizo 00:53, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely right. --Air 05:56, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, an Oviposter (what they are called in White Dwarf) is what Genestealers do have and it just means egg layer. Animals can lay different eggs from whatever they want in a fantasy environment. SanchiTachi 01:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid Tables?[edit]

I remember there being a set of Hybrid Tables out there from long ago. Basically, they listed what features (and the general appearence) of the Hybrids was as they passed from 1st Generation, straight through to Purestrain. The tables were for Human and Ork Hybrids, I believe. Would these be worth including under the Cult section? Dasleah 00:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Updated the Page[edit]

Could someone help expand the Broodlord section so the picture doesn't drop down so much into the Patriarch section. Thanks. SanchiTachi 02:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genestealer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505085830/http://us.games-workshop.com/games/40k/tyranids/articles/genesis.htm to http://us.games-workshop.com/games/40k/tyranids/articles/genesis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]