Talk:Vrbas Banovina

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vrbas Banovina article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yugoslavia High‑importance

	Vrbas Banovina is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bosnia and Herzegovina High‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Vrbas Banovina is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Population Data[edit]

Could person that added the population data also provide the source. It seems unusual that the population number of the region in 1931 remained nearly the same until 1991. (the region numbered little over 1 million in 1991). Also clarify if the census of 1931 (if that is where the data came from) counted religious groups only. --Dado 04:09, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

For Dado: How you know that ethnic composition was different then religious one? Do you have more information about this? User:PANONIAN

If population data noted in this article is taken from census (most are), census makes a differentiation between ethnic groups and religius groups. Enclosed data is apparently only covering religious groups. However, I would still like to know the source of this data as total population number doesn't seem to make sense compared to census data from 1991.--Dado 01:49, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am not aware of the banovinas still existing in 1991 so I can not say what the banovina's population was in 1991 but the 1931 figures are probably from the census which recorded the population's religion and mother tongue.

change of banovina's borders in first Yugoslavia [1],[2] --Čeha (razgovor) 10:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]