Talk:Gilbert Vernam

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

I think the Wikipedia style guide recommends "a captain" rather than "a Captain" here: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Job_titles — Matt 17:32, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Matt, Didn't know there was a WP style guide on this point. But in this case it's wrong. In the US Army, one may have a rank, written Captain. I suppose one would be a captain in the longer history of military ranks. But, if referring to a particular person with this rank in the USA, he (or she) is a Captain. I think it works the same way in the Royal Navy, but I know so little about the British Army that things may be different there.

The distinction seems to be that individual rank applying to a particular person is initial cap. So, Captain Smith, "Smith is a Captain". On the other hand, speaking of the rank generally, as in, "All the captains I've seen this week have been three sheets to the wind" or "The captains of industry have gathered to discuss export policy", would be lower case.

I assure you that individuals in the USA care about this point.

You might wish to amend the manual of style (they specifically solicit for exceptions) on this point.

Welcome back, I've wondered about your absence.

Thanks, I've been on holiday in Tanzania for a bit.

I take it, that I have been missing some fine points in formatting the first versions of articles. I'll try to mend my ways.

Well, content tends to be more useful than formatting, since there are many more capable copyeditors than there are those with specialist knowledge of topic X...Thanks for starting these articles, anyway. I don't suppose you'd be able to insert a link directly into List of cryptography topics on creation? Makes it a little easier to maintain the page. — Matt 18:11, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

ww 17:39, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I have been unable to find any patent specifically on the one-time tape system, only Vernam's 1918 patent. Can someone pin down the exact date and a link to the one-time tape patent "in the mid-1920s", as the article states? None of the related articles, like [Vernam cipher] and [Joseph Mauborgne], mention any later patent at all. --Rpresser 02:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also the discussion at Talk:Vernam cipher --agr 04:48, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)