Talk:Tampico Affair

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Untitled[edit]

It's growing late - and finishing this will probably take four more hours. I'll find the time soon. Please don't restore any old parts - it was factually horrible. Lotsofissues 07:15, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

'...specially..'[edit]

I know it is a word beyond the commonly heard misuse as a shortened 'especally', i.e. '...'specially...', but I don't think it is used correctly in the article: '...Mexico refused to participate with the USA in its military excursion in Europe and granted full-guaranties to the German companies for keeping their operations open, specially in Mexico City...' . Additionally it sounds like it may have been added intentionally as attempted humor, making fun of the way some non-native speakers of English sound. . 70.171.47.39 (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)BGriffin[reply]

Incorrect category?[edit]

The following category does not appear to be correct, as there were fatalities among both military forces, and thirdly, among civilians in the fighting and occupation of Veracruz: "Category:Battles and conflicts without fatalities" . I deleted it.Parkwells (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Over-reliance on newspapers[edit]

Editors' efforts to use Library of Congress resources are admirable, but later academic books or scholarly studies could be added to the use of newspapers of that period, for providing some perspective.Parkwells (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

aftermath[edit]

we have two aftermath sections in the article, I don't know enough about the incident to fix it but thought I should point it out TheEditor1974 (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]