User talk:Thomas h

Welcome!

Hello, Thomas h, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:44, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

The "ex-premie" hell[edit]

Hi. I don't know who undeleted it, but I can see why they did it. It can last one more day before deletion under due process. Rick K 20:10, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)

An article remains on the VfD page for 5 days from the time of listing. It was only listed on the 15th. It should be deleted on the 20th. Rick K 08:07, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

Don't understand your remark[edit]

In Talk:Criticism of Prem Rawat you commented:

i am just following you from the DfV-Page were you avoid to answer why you have created that article and said "opposing views go here"; to pop up here with such sincere questions. i feel tricked by you and i want to express my distrust to you as a person. Thomas h 22:26, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I honestly don't understand what you're saying.

I did not create Criticism of Prem Rawat.

I have never edited Criticism of Prem Rawat.

I have never edited the Prem Rawat article.

I have not placed any remark anywhere saying "criticism can go here." I'm sorry you distrust me, but I'm honestly baffled by what you say. Dpbsmith (talk) 22:35, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I honestly apologize confusing you with somebody else. SorryThomas h 08:09, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:01, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Adminship[edit]

Your oposition to my adminship nomination is noted, but please refraing from trolling for votes against me. Thanks. --ZappaZ 15:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me answer you with this from your hustle to adminship:

How farcical, Zappaz. "trolling"? "Trolling" makes it sound like Thomas picked people at random to say "Hey, you wanna vote against this guy you barely know?" instead of what any person can verify he actually said by following the link you provided, which is that since he knew I am not sympathetic to you (putting it mildly) he thought I would want to be alerted that you were being proposed for adminship, in which he is completely right. If it's incorrect to alert people to major decisions being made that you think they would care about, then stand in line, because you've not only done exactly that yourself, but personally instructed others to do so. [1]-- Antaeus Feldspar 01:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks almost like you are the incarnation of double standard ;-); why do you never ask your opponents, how to be a better writer? Thomas h 08:35, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]