Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materiel
 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Materiel.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to keep the article.
Another dicdef by anon User:24.218.52.116, redirect to material (material is materiel in French), or expand? Dunc Harris | Talk 09:42, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- No. "Materiel" is an English word with a very different meaning than "material." I suggest redirect to Military technology and equipment. -- Wikisux 20:33, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- Not happy about the redirect (which appears to have, uh, 'appeared'). "Materiel" is also consistently used in non-military dostribution companies too. The redirect now takes it to a page that (sfaict) doesn't include the term nor explain why it has been divererted there. Will undertake to create a proper entry. --VampWillow 12:26, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I think materiel is suitable topic to have an article on. It has a much wider scope than material, so should not be redirected. -- Popsracer 05:33, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a good concept to illuminate when everyone not exposed to commercial goods flow thinks you're simply misspelling. (Personal axe: my father's title was "Manager of traffic, distribution, and materiel.") Okay, now I've massaged the article some. --Gary D 23:43, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.