Talk:Dirk Wears White Sox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Independent charts[edit]

This album was the first to top the British Independent LP chart when it started in 1979, rather giving the lie to the theory that Adam Ant was nowhere commercially previous to "Dog Eat Dog": he just wasn't selling records in Woolworths.

Cover[edit]

I think the image on this page ought to be the original monochrome Do-It cover, which is now reproduced on many of the CD reissues. The current image is from the US version(s). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.100.248.6 (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Both versions can be on the page... the second one can be labeled as "The original Do-It cover" or something like that. In other words, I believe they should both be represented. - Antmusic 18:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thought I'd done this ages ago. Anyway, I just did. ProhibitOnions (T) 19:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change in style for Wikiproject Albums[edit]

About the line:
... before Adam went on to fame with "Kings of the Wild Frontier".
If we are talking about the song, it is fine... if we are talking about the album, it needs to look like this:
... before Adam went on to fame with Kings of the Wild Frontier.
to comply with wikiproject albums. - Antmusic 15:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Remixing on 1983 Epic/CBS version![edit]

I've deleted all references to the CBS/Epic 1983 version being remixed as it is a complete myth put about by reviewers at the time. All the mixes are the same as on the original Do It discs 80.249.48.108 (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 2 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible improvements[edit]

My apologies—I am not a music historian or a frequent Wikipedia contributor and I cannot devote the time to this sort of research; but this entry is woefully deficient. It lacks all discussion of the record's creation—inspiration, songwriting, recording, and anything to do with the music industry that midwifed "Dirk". It lacks discussion of the record's release, exposure, and charting in places other than Britain. It lacks significant context on what Ant and the band were doing in the period immediately preceding and succeeding the record's release (I'm not sure how you can say the group "disbanded after the album was released" without mentioning Malcolm McLaren). The "Reception" subhead should actually discuss how the record was received by the public and the critics, not (or not merely) how it was assessed "retrospectively" by a single critic years later. Sebum-n-soda (talk) 15:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this content you request belongs on the Adam and the Ants article, not this one. It's someone's first album so as is usual there wasn't much in the way of creation of a solid body of work, just a compilation of stuff that was getting played live at the shows (most of it fairly recent stuff except for Cleopatra.) As far as anyone knows it never did chart anywhere other than in Britain. Another poster has pointed out that it was the number 1 in the first ever Indie Charts, however it did not touch the mainstream UK Album Chart until Feb 1981, largely off the back of the success of the follow-up Kings album its and associated singles. 86.138.4.86 (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dirk Wears White Sox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dirt wears white socks[edit]

Thought that was the title and thought, what a great line! Disappointed now. Acorrector (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]