Talk:The Oregonian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OregonLive.com[edit]

Was there an article for OregonLive.com at one point? I thought I saw it previously, but see that OregonLive now links to The Oregonian. Are they not considered separate companies? Perhaps OregonLive does not satisfy a notability requirement. --Another Believer (Talk) 06:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

This edit, which made some good updates and changes, also eliminated a little material that might be considered unfavorable to the Oregonian -- about shutting down the Oregon Journal, and about the WW scooping them on the Goldschmidt story. Might bear some looking into. -Pete (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Here's an image that might merit inclusion, from Joseph Gaston's 1911 history of Portland. -Pete (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New "Political stance" section needed[edit]

I don't have time to write it at the moment, but I just wanted to make a note that a "Political stance" section is definitely needed. Even though accusations of political bias are mentioned at times throughout other parts of the article, many other newspapers have such a section broken out (some even have "Political stance" as a list item in the box to the right). Here is one resource that will be helpful in talking about the politics of the Oregonian over time: http://crosscut.com/2013/06/oregonians-cutbacks-newspapers-layoffs-delivery/ And it should be noted that the Willamette Week has done a ton of great reporting on the O. --Thfump (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second reference[edit]

The second reference, for the staff count, is a dead URL. -- SatanicSanta 22:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Oregonian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on The Oregonian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential endorsement[edit]

This article implies by omission that The Oregonian first declined to endorse a U.S. presidential candidate in 2016. In fact, the paper hasn't endorsed a presidential candidate since 2008[1], when it endorsed Barack Obama[2]. In any case, a citation is needed.

67.169.200.54 (talk) 00:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Gunderson, Laura (2016-10-14). "Why we won't endorse a presidential candidate: Editorial Endorsement 2016". oregonlive.com. Retrieved 2017-12-24.
  2. ^ Attig, Rick (2008-10-24). "Obama for President". oregonlive.com. Retrieved 2017-12-24.
Thanks for providing these sources. I've rephrased the article to clarify that the 2016 election wasn't the first time The Oregonian/OregonLive's editorial board didn't make a presidential endorsement. Feel free to tweak the new wording or post another message here if you think it still needs improvement. — Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Circulation[edit]

http://www.orenews.com/portland-oregonian the data on this site is more detailed, but no date.. Graywalls (talk) 16:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portland Reporter[edit]

Wow, I thought we had an article on this spinoff, also described (laughably) as a "throwaway", paper, but apparently not. Parking this source here for the time being: [1] -Pete Forsyth (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Oregonian&oldid=1210686006"