Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burberryism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

---

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 16:31, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Burberryism

Newly founded religion with no national or international importance, looks like vanity. Delete. I've already speedied article on its creator. Putting this one here, to see if I'm right in doing so. Mgm|^(talk) 17:18, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Yes, Mgm, I believe you did the right thing. Smells hoaxycliquey to me. FreplySpang (talk) 20:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Chavcruft. Otherwise redirect to Chav / Klonimus 21:35, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• No such religion. No such word, even. Delete. Uncle G 02:43, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/hoax. ?Seselwa 06:12, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:52, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Spoof, or perhaps to be very charitable, attempt at social commentary. Alai 07:47, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Delete - David Gerard 09:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete Hold up lads. You seem to have pages on other religions, for what reason are you discriminating against this particular one.wrightginger
  • That unsigned comment is from user:81.130.181.226 whose other edits are mostly vandalism. P Ingerson 12:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • The thing is, wrightginger, we have pages on religions that really exist. Yours doesn't. — JIP | Talk 09:04, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • this religion certainly does exist. where do you come from, if you are ever in london go south to dulwich peckham or sydenham and ask anyone you meet. thry will inform you at your foolishness. primeporkchop
• Delete. Hoax/spoof. P Ingerson 12:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks mate, clearly you do not quite understand what vandalism is (this is why you, and many like you need to be educated by joining Burberryism) graffiti is vandalism, a broken window is vandalism. Writing a page on an internet encyclopedia about a community of people in South London, known as Burberryism, is not vandalism. Sorry to dissapoint you. Wrightginger
    • The term "vandalism" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia. I suggest you go look up Wikipedia:Vandalism. — JIP | Talk 06:07, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• BALEETED—Trevor Caira 12:17, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, religion vanity, or patent nonsense. — JIP | Talk 09:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do Not DeletePersonally I feel ashamed that a nation of such religious tolerance could feel so strongly against this.Shame on you and i praise the wrightginger for his courage to stand up to you,you arrogant Oxford-graduates(by the way Cambridge rock)

• Do Not Delete I strongly agree, all faiths should be allowed, however radical. If a political party which is racist and intolerant(the BNP) is allowed to run in this country why is this page about a faith which only promotes peace and love deleted primeporkchop
  • No count. New troll. Mikkalai 19:00, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Fails the Google check horribly, with four matches. This is the primary match, and the other three all disagree with the article. Trylobyte|Talk 00:38, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete A religion of love and peace founded on the concept of hating poor people. I hope to God it is a hoax. Delete hoax Dsmdgold 00:46, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 19:00, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do Not Delete Worthy of consideration.In any case surely this article should be allowed to stay on.I mean if you don't give it a chance how will this religion get of the ground.(The lovable duck)

• Delete any article supported by pork chops and ducks. - Lucky 6.9 04:27, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do Not DeleteBy all means this could be what Ken Livingstone is looking for to reduce street crime in London.(the stray cat) Do Not Delete because I said so. Giri

• Comment: I'm going to expand my principles to include an automatic delete of any article supported by cats and Giris. I said so. Deal with it.  :) - Lucky 6.9 23:16, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Hedley 02:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Poorly written nonsense. --StoatBringer 22:26, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Should have been speedied as nonsense. Postdlf 02:42, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not DeleteRemember boys will be boys.They will keep on creating artciles until you give in.(the supreme one)
• Do Not DeleteI think u guys should just leave this article alone and get a life.By the way Giri is a person,not a breed of animal.(the wedding singer)

• Delete. no comment even needed. Luis rib 14:01, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

---

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.