Talk:Drew Struzan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


E.T. movie poster?[edit]

Drew Struzan did not design the movie poster for E.T... John Alvin did. [1] [2] This is easily verifiable by googling "John Alvin," not to mention that it was Alvin, and not Struzan or anyone else, who received the Hollywood Reporter Key Art Award and the Saturn Award for the E.T. poster. Anyone care to explain why this article claims Struzan designed that poster?

I'll tell you why, cause Drew did one version and it was the BEST version. Speilberg loves the artwork that Drew did and hated John Alvin's version. But the idiots opted for Alvin's version even though Speilberg wanted the Drew painting.

For any movie campaign there are several posters and different pieces of art created, so it is possible for more than one artist to be credited with the same campaign even though they both produced different pieces of art for that same campaign. This does not take anything from Alvin's equally impressive work or accomplishments. John Alvin created the distinctive "fingers touching" ET poster for one. Struzan has created other posters for the ET campaign, including the poster showing the character of ET in front of the San Fernando Valley skyline reaching up toward his ship that rises above him, and the even more distinctive one showing ET with his finger aglow, peeking from the basket on Elliot's bike (this art also being widely used by all the Universal theme parks). Further, by decree of Spielberg, Struzan remains the only illustrator allowed to render the character of ET in full.--71.134.156.170 21:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Struzan did not work on the U.S. domestic theatrical campaign for E.T. -- the poster (the "Creation of Adam") artwork, which was the initial one-sheet for ET, and most closely associated with the film, was by John Alvin. Struzan, like many of his projects, worked on later comissioned artworks, outside the film's first release/campaign. The article states: "Spielberg decreeing that Struzan be the only artist allowed to render the space-creature character E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial." is also misleading, since it doesn't draw the distinction of his post-release work on the film and his lack of involvement with the campaign centered around John Alvin's work. I cannot find any source for this Speilberg quote -- can someone please cite the source or point it out here? Otherwise the quote should be removed and/or put in a proper context. --Jca2112 06:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Struzan was involved in the initial development and design of the E.T. character for the film's production. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runawaybrain (talkcontribs) 09:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Welcome To My Nightmare.jpg[edit]

Image:Welcome To My Nightmare.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:L e2355e5b8f5db19cc52f4f5169b90c46.jpg[edit]

The image Image:L e2355e5b8f5db19cc52f4f5169b90c46.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raiders of the Lost Ark[edit]

The article says that Struzan painted movie posters for all of the Indiana Jones films, including presumably Raiders. Of course the two famous posters were painted by Richard Amsel. Struzan's own website sells a print of his poster, but I can't find any evidence that it was actually commissioned or used for the original cinema release of the film. It appears to have been commissioned as a piece of official merchandise for the tenth anniversary of the film. His website says it was used internationally, but where? I mention this because tonnes of websites attribute Amsel's two posters to Struzan (even though they clearly have Amsel's signature on them) and Struzan's poster looks unusually rushed - Marion's face doesn't look right. 80.189.191.20 (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struzan's "Raiders" poster was the international poster for the original release of the film and used in regions such as: Japan, Italy, Belgium, and Thailand. His same artwork was then used again as the 10th anniversary re-release poster. Struzan also produced 2 other poster comps for "Raiders". 71.129.35.101 (talk) 07:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Drew Struzan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Drew Struzan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Birth[edit]

Was he born on March 18 (?) or May 14 ([3])? Nut1917 (talk) 08:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]