Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan of Arc (historical figure)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 01:48, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Joan of Arc (historical figure)[edit]
Fork of main article Joan of Arc. Noisy | Talk 15:47, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
- Speeded as a fork of Joan of Arc. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:23, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Tony, that was too hasty. There may have been a reason for it. We should've at least let the vote play out normally. Everyking 22:31, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There is no reason to duplicate content on Wikipedia. It disrupts the history. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- You should let the vote play out regardless. It hurts nothing to leave it around for a few days so it gets a proper vote. Everyking 23:22, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point, but if it gets speedied asap then there's less chance of having to merge diverging histories. VfD's resulting in deletion votes last at least FIVE DAYS, which can amount to a hell of a lot of history. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Fine, have it your way, I wouldn't want the article around anyway. Everyking 00:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point, but if it gets speedied asap then there's less chance of having to merge diverging histories. VfD's resulting in deletion votes last at least FIVE DAYS, which can amount to a hell of a lot of history. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- You should let the vote play out regardless. It hurts nothing to leave it around for a few days so it gets a proper vote. Everyking 23:22, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There is no reason to duplicate content on Wikipedia. It disrupts the history. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Tony, that was too hasty. There may have been a reason for it. We should've at least let the vote play out normally. Everyking 22:31, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Duplicate of main article with no links to it. Noisy | Talk 15:47, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
- So she's not Noah's wife? Delete as fork. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:20, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
- Who are they going to confuse her with? Joan of Arc (the sandwich)? Delete. Nestea 18:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There is a Joan of Arc movie, not that it's relevant. —Wahoofive (talk) 21:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Tentative delete, but I'd like to know why this was created. Conceivably, I guess there could be a legit reason. Everyking 18:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, duplicate. No need to add specification in the brackets, there's only one Joan of Arc. Also, references seem to be missing in the duplicate. Mgm|(talk) 21:14, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete duplicate fork. The historical figure is properly at Joan of Arc rather than a modified title—it's only any other use of that title or name that should be disambiguated. Postdlf 21:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.