Talk:Korean calligraphy
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Updated, any comments post to POofYS Dated 04:05, 8 April 2005.
The article used to end in: "Thus in this article we shall divide the history into Korean calligraphy in languages not purely Korean as the first part of this article; and the new approach to Korean calligraphy in the Korean language in the second part of the article."
this implies it was copy&pasted from a research paper without proper mentioning of the author, which is potentially bad practice I guess? (clem 22:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC))
Jong-sung?[edit]
What is this phrase that is used in the article, in reference to modern hangul calligraphy? Is this 종숭? This makes no sense to me. Jyg (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Or 종성 (final consonant, e.g. ㄱ in 책). But it still doesn't make sense and I think the whole paragraph (added by an IP) may be removed. Seudo (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Korean calligraphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050416042438/http://kn.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2001/01/13/200101130043.asp to http://kn.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2001/01/13/200101130043.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)