User talk:Kosebamse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes

No ping pong talk, please: I usually look after talk pages where I have recently been involved. There is no need to extend discussions to more than one page.

No article watchlist: I don't keep an article watchlist (although I look into the "related changes" for User:Kosebamse/stuff once in a while).

Old talk archived: (Jan - Oct 2003) - (Oct 2003 - Jan 2004) - (Jan - April 2004) - (April 2004 - Jan 2005) - (Jan 2005 - Jun 2005) - (Jul 2005 - April 2006) - (Jun 2006 - Feb 2008)


Current affairs[edit]

Documentation of the IRC arbitration case has been moved to User:Kosebamse/IRC.

Anesthesia/Analgesia[edit]

I see you defined anesthesiology as the area of your expertise at WP:MED. Could you please comment at Talk:Epidural. Should it be moved to epidural anesthesia or epidural analgesia if at all? --Eleassar my talk 06:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kosebamse (talk) 06:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The use of sedation in Christian terrorism[edit]

This nice diff is for you, you evil sedatious man! How dare you! :-D Bishonen | talk 23:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I deeply regret, my lady (or is it Most Noble Born ?), that my little pedantry seems so, ehem, defanately on the spot as to inconvenience your ladyship, but remain convinced that the noble cause, the steady pursuit of formal accuracy, will eventually justify such slight disagreements. Please allow me to assure you of my true esteem; I remain, with respectful compliments, your most obedient servant, Kosebamse (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
..rawr?... bishzilla ROARR!! 21:15, 18 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

If ...[edit]

Hi Kosebamse! Good to see you again ... thank you for the compliment on my page (it's also been called "arrogant, conformist," and "[has a] moral attitude worse than one of open aggression" -- or something like that -- which particularly amuses me -- it's on the talk page). Yes, If. Those "two imposters" are exactly our worst enemies as Wikipedians (clothed as "praise" and "blame", anyway). I'm not as skilled with verse as some around here; I bet one of Geogre's talk page stalkers could probably put in some lines just right! By the way, that quotation from Montaigne at the top of your user page should be chiseled on Carrara marble on the front steps of Wikipedia; I wish everyone would take it to heart. Montaigne really does get it right a lot of the time; each time I pick up his book of Essays again it shocks me that the thing is more then 400 years old. Good idea on the poem! Antandrus (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schubert's last sonatas[edit]

Hi. I just posted Talk:Schubert's last sonatas#Response to peer review. Cheers, Gidip (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the feedback[edit]

Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more equally well-thought-out suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 21:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North Sea[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the North Sea article. I have re-written some sections so that they can have sources, references and citations for every fact. Can you be a second set of eyes, and see if every number, year, new piece of info has a citation please. If you see a copy edit that needs being done, could you also help the article in the midst of the GA review. The GA review is currently studying the verifiablity of the article and if it is properly referenced with verifiable sources for facts. Kind Regards and thank you.SriMesh | talk 00:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the great work on that article! Unfortunately, I have little time at the moment and will not be able to do much, but have left a bit of comment on the article's talk page. Will try to look over the article again in a while. Kosebamse (talk) 08:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comments on the North Sea talk page. I have fixed the conversion template which was employed to a different one. The noticing of the degree of sig figs used was an excellent point to mention, and which I didn't notice at all. I will fix also the coordinates, now that the geogroups template is functioning. The coordinates are no longer needed in the North Sea article. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names[edit]

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 03:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there were a sarcasm award[edit]

I'd shower you with gold and medals (or just gold medals) for this. Come visit my talk page every once in awhile. The humor might be a bit ribald and occasionally leftist, but join in. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hrmph. Too bad that those who deserve sarcastic comments most are usually those who understand them least. Must be to do with the inner nature of wit. Or whatever. Thanks for the compliments, and for the invitation, I'll sure drop by once in a while. Kosebamse (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy and Poddie[edit]

Oh, there you are! Hi Teddy, long time! Bishonen | talk 22:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Teddy, Teddy! bishapod splash! 22:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Hiya Poddie dear! Been away to the realm of weirdness. How's it going with your club? How's your boss doing? Got enough plushies? Kosebamse (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your User Page on Wikipedia.de[edit]

See me: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion%3AKosebamse&diff=63763013&oldid=6978414

and an other: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer%3AKosebamse&diff=63763239&oldid=683398 and http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:Kosebamse&diff=next&oldid=63763013

Greetings --pistazienfresser (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Random Pages Test[edit]

Hello, I've started a discussion that involves you at User talk:Rebecca#Random Pages Test. Could you kindly indulge my 'wiki-historian' interests by commenting there? Thanks :) -- œ™ 09:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Castles in the air[edit]

I have added a comment regarding this redirect, which you may want to look into. (I have no strong feelings and will not persue this issue.)

Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Castles_in_the_air Michael Eriksson (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neither have I, but thanks for the information. Cheers, Kosebamse (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Courtesy flag[edit]

The article Courtesy flag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   — Jeff G.  ツ 19:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grijpstra and de Gier for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grijpstra and de Gier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grijpstra and de Gier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality spot check[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality spot check, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality spot check and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality spot check during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kleinzach 22:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change[edit]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks fo the information.Kosebamse (talk) 05:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christmasbamse[edit]

Hi little Bamse! Merry snow Christmas, enjoy sledding! Check out cool morning star santa hat! darwinbish WHACK! 19:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Twins Bishzilla's little helpers! Keep 'em off the streets! Happy holidays! bishzilla ROARR!! 11:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Awwwww! (Little Bamse flees in terror, cov/wers under a heap of snow). Kosebamse (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sail Training International for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sail Training International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sail Training International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 01:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Astro-Physics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astro-Physics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astro-Physics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TMB Optical for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TMB Optical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMB Optical (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 18:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 14:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kosebamse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kosebamse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sentinel Islands for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sentinel Islands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentinel Islands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LukeSurl t c 10:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kosebamse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kosebamse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Christiansø[edit]

Hello, Kosebamse,

Thanks for creating Christiansø! I edit here too, under the username MurielMary and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add references to this article. All WP articles must have at least one reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MurielMary}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MurielMary (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kosebamse&oldid=1138933478"