Talk:Charlotte Ross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nude image[edit]

Whats wrong w this image?

File:Charlotterossnypdblue.jpg
Charlotte Ross nude in an episode of NYPD Blue.

(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:14, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nothing, if you want to whack off to it. It's just not encyclopedic or professional for an article on her. Mike H 21:19, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
There's not enough nudity. AngryParsley 21:20, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Have you seen woman? Or auto fellatio, or clitoris, or whatever? I think the image is a good one, and I see no reason nto to use it. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:28, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Charlotte Ross is not known for her nudity. There's no reason for it to be in her article. Mike H 21:29, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

I disagree with you on both counts. For one thing I know absolutely nothing about her other than that she was naked on NYPD blue. For another, this sort of thing ads alot to what is otherwise a fairly uninteresting article. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:33, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

She was a regular cast member on the show, not one who just came on for T&A. She was also on Days of Our Lives for four years, things you would have known if you took the five seconds needed to read the article. Mike H 21:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Well of course I did that (I kinda had to, since I edited it a couple of times), I was over simplifying for the sake of politeness I suppose. Maybe I should have said "I never cared about about Charlotte Ross much, the only memorable aspect about her for me was that she was naked on television", but I thought that might have been discourteous. Anyhow, her nudity is fairly significant IMO, how many people have been nude on a major broadcast television network in the US? And @ Angry Parsley, what do you mean "whats up w Sam Spade all of a sudden"? (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 21:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Almost every cast member of NYPD Blue has been nude at one time or another. The nudity thing isn't that shocking anymore, especially when it happened to her (2003). Mike H 22:03, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

I didn't mean to suggest it shocked me, only that the transition from nudity being verboten (it wasn't illegal, but there was an understanding between the stations and the advertisers) and the normal relationship with nudity found in europe is a signifigant one, worthy of documentation. Ms. Ross was part of that process, and is noteworthy as such. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 08:50, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

She's just as noteworthy as Dennis Franz. Why don't we put his ass up on Wikipedia? Mike H 08:51, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Feel free, I don't happen to have free image of his arse, nor an interest in procuring one. I surely won't vote to delete it if you find one tho ;) (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:40, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]