Talk:Lovćen

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source?[edit]

This article is written more in a tourist guide kind of style and indeed I found it at Mount Lovcen. The site says Copyright (c) National Tourism Organisation of Montenegro. Do we have their permission to use it under GFDL? --Romanm 07:31, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

It is governmental website. They don`t have right to put copyright for the information. It is about webdesign.--[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 10:14, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Actually, the national tourism organization doesn't have to be a government agency, it could be a state-owned enterprise, in which case it can hold copyright. In any event, the generic text can be rephrased. --Joy [shallot] 14:21, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I see no evidence to support a claim that the government of Montenegro cannot hold copyright. As someone had to make a decision about it, I simply deleted the article as copyvio. -- Cyrius|✎

Will someone please note that Mount Lovchen is the "black mountain" for which Montenegro is named? - It was one of them. Lovcen, Orijen and other mountains around were covered with dark forests in medieval ages and looked black if you were looking at them from the sea so the sailors named it black mountain. This is just one story how the country got it's name, but I it's the most probable one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.155.38.107 (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Should this article be titled Mount Lovcen instead of just Lovcen? If it decided not, then it should have a redirect for it. —Mike 07:04, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

I'm not aware of any other notable landmarks called "Lovcen", so it doesn't need the "Mount" prefix to distinguish itself from other articles. I created the redirect. --Joy [shallot] 11:21, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The same could be said of Kilimanjaro, which has no disambiguation and yet still redirects to Mount Kilimanjaro. Failing to have found anything at Naming conventions, I added a (minuscule) stub at Mount Lovcen, and a redirect here. --Fbriere 07:08, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Per User talk:Fbriere#Re: Mount Lovcen, I moved it back over here. Cf. also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). --Joy [shallot] 19:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, there's also Lovcen cigarette brand in Serbia & Montenegro... So maybe disambig... I dunno --Dungodung 11:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, Lovcen cigarette is named after the mount of Lovcen, so disambig would not be good, IMHO. --romanm (talk) 23:11, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lovćen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]