Talk:Honus Wagner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox Spells 'Eligible' Incorrectly[edit]

Infobox has eligible misspelled as 'elligible'. I'm amazed that I seem to be the only one to notice this! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.30.5.160 (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Saying[edit]

There was a saying that he threw so hard from short to first that some infield dirt arrived with the ball. Apocryphal, but fun.

Also that he had a showdown with the other "greatest" dead-ball era player, Ty Cobb, at the 1908 (?) World Series. He out-hit Cobb and got him out stealing once. User:134.4.61.136 16:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • They faced each other in 1909. Some apocryphal stories indeed came from that meeting. Wahkeenah 17:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wagner gained his reputation as "the man who made the Georgia Peach bleed" during this series.--Philvid2 02:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As to personal life, all I was able to find on a fairly quick web search was that he had a granddaughter (which is mentioned in the article). From that, we can of course deduce that he had a wife and at least one child. But that's all I got.

Wife, Marriage & Children[edit]

If he married his wife in 1894 and his first daughter was born in 1918 and his last in 1922, then his wife must've been quite young to have had her last child 28 years later. IOW, something about this doesn't add up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.51.175 (talk) 06:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Illusion[edit]

Okay, this is probably nitpicking, but I wanted to comment on the sentence that says, "Magician David Copperfield once tore up a Honus Wagner baseball card during a televised magic show, he then restored the card piece by piece, until it was again intact."

As someone who dabbled in sleight of hand as a youth, I can assure you David Copperfield did not tear up and "restore" a Honus Wagner baseball card, he only gave the illusion he did so. The secret to this trick can be purchased in any major bookstore for under ten bucks. In fact, it might even be free online somewhere.

Like I said, this is probably trivial, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. Great article!


"David Copperfield Torn and Restored Baseball card" (with Gretzky and McNall!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0mMofqlS3g 199.214.24.196 23:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Card[edit]

Should mention that the reason the card is so rare is that he didn't want to be associated with tobacco... AnonMoos 21:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a confirmed fact. His first "card" (for lack of a better term) is a tobacco card. --Wolverinegod 21:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus Image[edit]

Why is there a picture of Matty in the article? Does anyone know how to remove it, i don't see it in the code under 'edit this page'--Wolverinegod 00:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The text from the "early life" section runs into the picture at right of (presumably) the MLB Hall of Fame. Ths is surely different in different browsers/resolutions, but for reference, I'm in Firefox 1.5.0.7 with res of 1280x1024. Not sure how to fix this, or I would. SINsApple 03:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons[edit]

Not to be the guy that tries and gets Simpsons on every page, but if there is ever a section that discusses Honus Wagner in popular culture or something, it would be worth mentioning that he is one of Mr. Burns three dream team players in the episode "Homer at Bat".--Twintone 17:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I certainly believe that the T206 card deserves some mention on this page, I feel the majority of the content should be moved to the T206 page. There is already a section there and these two sections can be combined with some effort. Does anyone object? If so, please provide some rationale. If nothing happens, i'll move the text in question. Thanks // Tecmobowl 20:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write[edit]

I am currently overhauling this article in my sandbox. I would like to get it up to atleast a GA class article. All questions, comments, help are welcome on my talk page or in the sandbox. Thank you. Blackngold29 04:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of Honus Wagner[edit]

The final IPA symbol for Wagner does not appear in the list of IPA symbols. It looks like a check mark, but should probably be an "r". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.96.240 (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Brothers and Sisters[edit]

Someone please address this: "Wagner was one of five children, although only five lived past childhood." 71.234.37.99 (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Will in New Haven71.234.37.99 (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Websites Honus Wagner[edit]

www.honuswagner.com

What does this mean? (card section)[edit]

I'm having some trouble interpreting this part in bold: "There are 57 known copies and there are many other cards that only have 1 or 2 known examples depicting Wagner." What does that mean? Is there a word missing? Zagalejo^^^ 03:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teams[edit]

OK I'm a little confused. The article says Ed Barrows signed Wagner to play for the Atlantic League in 1896. This makes sense -- the Atlantic League didn't exist before 1896. Honus played for the Paterson Silk Weavers, if the Atlantic League (1896–1900) article is to be believed.

Anyway, this article then goes on to say that Honus hit .313 in 1896 and then .375 "the next year." I take this to mean 1897. But the infobox says he was playing for the Louisville Colonels from 1897 to 1899.

So point of confusion. Who was Honus Wagner playing for in 1897? The Silk Weavers or the Colonels? When did he start with the Colonels?

Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 06:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The great Flying Dutchman played partial seasons for both clubs in 1897:[1] He made his major league debut on July 19, 1897.[2]Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honuswagnerstatue.JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Honuswagnerstatue.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IWW membership[edit]

There's apparently a long-running rumor that Honus Wagner was a "Wobbly", or an Industrial Workers of the World member. I'm not entirely sure of the basis of this rumor, and I've read an argument[3] that suggests that he may instead have been a member of a miner's union that predates the IWW if a member of any at all. If there are any reliable sources that describe his early life, the "Early life" section could be expanded a bit and likely shed light to this. Djr13 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname "The Flying Dutchman"[edit]

The article says that Honus Wagner's nickname "The Flying Dutchman" derived from his speed and from a corruption of "Deutchman" into "Dutchman". While the story of "Deutch" being corrupted to "Dutch" has been popularized in the case of the "Pennsylvania Dutch", I suspect it is not so clear in the case at hand. Surely it can't be a coincidence that there is an opera by the same name, written by a German composer with the same surname as Honus Wagner's. Can anyone cite an authoritative source for this?--Steviesk (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still outstanding so tagged. Davidships (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taking out a hit?[edit]

I've read the Louisville Colonels had one player who led the American Association in hitting for its entire existence. Am I right thinking it was Wagner? Does it merit a mention here? (Regrettably, the source might fail WP:RS: it was a factoid in Out Of the Park Baseball...) TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 17:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Honus Wagner/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

More references needed for a B, expansion needed for GA.--Wizardman 16:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Honus Wagner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honus Wagner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Honus as a person[edit]

One thing that strikes me when I read about Honus in various books is how people just loved this guy. I've never read a bad word about him. In fact, I suspect that one reason his contemporaries routinely considered him a better player than Cobb was because they liked him so much. Is there a place for that in the article, or does it need to be all baseball? Carlo (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in Statistics[edit]

The first (unattributed) set of statistics shows 327 strikeouts, while the Baseball-Reference.com set shows 737 SO. Which if either number is correct? That looks like a typo. And what's the origin of the first set? Milkunderwood (talk) 04:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely a typo, mistakenly restating the batting average as the strikeout count. It was posted over 10 years ago, by a user who hasn't been active in over four years.[4] Good catch! Also, Retrosheet's numbers vary a little bit.[5] I couldn't say which numbers are considered "official". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 15:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]