Talk:Belomorkanal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just a note: this thing (calling it a cigarette is a step too far) is the worst tobacco I've ever tried. Don't try them at home unless you are assisted by a group of medics and a chemical treatment squad. However, they have one big advantage over all other cigarettes: they are very useful in killing all moths and other insects in 20 metres radius. The problem is that you can't simply light one up and leave it in the ashtray while leaving the room: they don't burn that easily... Halibutt 16:20, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

A certain type of "Basic" (which name eludes me) is worse. My only complaint at the time was, like you said - they go out too fast for me. 68.81.29.74 06:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

when was the brand initiated and by whom, and who owns it now? Are there any tar/nicotine values available? dab () 21:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are available: Nicotine: 1,5 - 1,8 mg, Tar: 30 - 35 mg. Also, they're not made from normal paper - they're made from rice-paper (that was cheaper). - Sessy22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sessy22 (talkcontribs) 07:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The last paragraph seems unnecessary. I removed the statistic at the end after reading the article about the canal itself. ThoughtPollution (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article talks about 200,000,000 Gulag prisoners dying, and, just off-hand, that sounds a bit high to me. Two hundred million prisoner deaths? Can someone cite a source for that figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.23.86 (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly completely wrong! and now fixed. All the best: Rich Farmbrough22:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC).


Design[edit]

To normal people the history and design of the cigarettes is of interest (not it's gain for pot smokers...). Anyway - here is the list of designs of BELOMORKANAL over the decades. http://www.rucig.ru/pap_belomorkanal.htm How about adding it to the article? The newest designs are as disgusting as hereover - with neurotic non-smokers-stickers on it. Brave new world.

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.112.177.58 (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belomorkanal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belomorkanal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]