Talk:Nick.com

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Nick.com. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Nick.com at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

merge, 18 June 2007, see discussion.
redirect, August 2004, see discussion.

Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Page Picture[edit]

This page NEEDS a picture of the website's current page used in May 2007 because it has changed.Urena198 22:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry...i took care of that[edit]

i uploaded a screenshot

More information[edit]

This page needs more information about Nick.com, and a new screenshot. Or administrators will delete the article. --Macys123 20:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Before nominationg for deletion or merging...[edit]

There was an RfC for this here. The result of the discussion was almost unanimously split. -phobia don't be afraid to drop a line! 19:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie’s Backseat Traveling Web Show?[edit]

Why no mention? Tenk you veddy much. --Wack'd ^{Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork!} 12:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content[edit]

I want to add all the games from the website. I think it will help generate more pages about each game. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topherjaynes (talk • contribs) 21:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Video Merger Proposal[edit]

I propose that Nick Video be merged into Nick.com. I think that the content in the Nick Video article can easily be explained in the context of Nick.com, especially considering the site's recent redesign, and the Nick.com article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Nick Video will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.Furthermore, Nick Video, the service formerly known as TurboNick is no longer a notable stand-alone brand as online streaming has become much more ubiquitous than when the article was first created. I think keeping the most important meat from the Nick Video page in the section of the Nick.com page will more than suffice and that the programming list on the Nick Video page is outdated and irrelevant, as, stated before, online streaming is now ubiquitous. B6e5rEXagebR9c (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Club (Nickelodeon) Merger Proposal[edit]

I propose that The Club (Nickelodeon) be merged into Nick.com. I think that the content in the The Club (Nickelodeon) article can easily be explained in the context of Nick.com, especially considering the site's recent redesign and discontinuation of "The Club" service, and the Nick.com article is of a reasonable size that the merging of The Club (Nickelodeon) will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Now that "The Club" has been discontinued, I believe a brief, concise section on the Nick.com page about the history of the service would suffice. B6e5rEXagebR9c (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Nick.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930152455/http://www.nick.com/all_nick/everything_nick/history_home.jhtml to http://www.nick.com/all_nick/everything_nick/history_home.jhtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bing.com/search?q=Double%20Dare%202000&form=QBLH&qs=n
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005005043/http://www.radioink.com/article.asp?id=2705468&spid=24698 to http://www.radioink.com/article.asp?id=2705468&spid=24698
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003538925
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103121/http://sev.prnewswire.com/entertainment/20070618/NYM09318062007-1.html to http://sev.prnewswire.com/entertainment/20070618/NYM09318062007-1.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nick.com/mynick/messageboards/viewthread.jhtml?bID=106244&tID=3293917&mID=15361822&offset=0
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nick.com/mynick/messageboards/viewthread.jhtml?bID=106244&tID=3291925&mID=15350506&offset=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011172801/http://www.nick.com/all_nick/everything_nick/awards_home.jhtml to http://www.nick.com/all_nick/everything_nick/awards_home.jhtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nick.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bing.com/search?q=Double+Dare+2000&form=QBLH&qs=n
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091202054601/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/winners-2003.php to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/winners-2003.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did Nickelodeon steal my Nickpoints?[edit]

And my Wild Thornberrys trading cards. I miss them. Crypto thieves. >:O --108.20.46.192 (talk) 06:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Thundermans[edit]

I have a suggestion I think you guys should make a reboot of the Thundermans with the same actors and storyline but older with ThunderMan being a grandfather and Phoebe & Max as parents. Respond back to me please at reece@suchgear.com. 2600:387:C:6E14:0:0:0:1 (talk) 20:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]