Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire Ivory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:31, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
Vampire Ivory[edit]
Reads like a hoax or some cruft from some role-playing game. Or could this be a real myth instead? No help from Google. jni 09:59, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Silly, probably created by goth wannabes. Not even on Snopes, so not a famous hoax. Delete. Radiant! 10:53, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete likely some sort of cruft from some kind of ficton or RPG Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:03, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete cruft. – flamurai (t) 11:38, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Would appear to be something from a modern, obscure work of fiction. No impact outside that work, so clearly not warranting an article. Even worse, the article presents this fiction as fact. Average Earthman 13:25, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. At best, would need a fiction template tag, but it's not even notable enough for that in my opinion. HyperZonk 17:26, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, plainly fiction (and should have been tagged as such), this is either innocent goth cruft or a stealth ad for some sort of fiction or game. Wyss 18:00, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, even if it's real. Carrp | Talk 18:03, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Who thinks of this rubbish? Brookie 19:00, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merge into Vampire. If the author is serious about wanting this material in, then it could go into the Vampire article rather than into the trash bin. Courtland 05:49, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)
- Merge anything useable to Vampire, and add redirect. Megan1967 07:01, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolutely do not merge unless the material is independently verified as a legend or from some notable fictional source, as opposed to someone's RPG campaign. Gamaliel 07:12, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.