Talk:Dudleya virens

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common name[edit]

I have never heard of this plant referred to as the Alabaster plant. What's the source for that as the most common name? Live forever is quite common. And the scientific name is often used too. -Willmcw 19:56, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Jepson calls it bright green dudleya or green liveforever, though here is a reference for alabaster plant Nereocystis 17:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That reference is merely a mirror of this site. ;) -Willmcw 19:39, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

More sensible to have the species at its sci name - MPF 12:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subspecies are endangered, but probably not species[edit]

Here's a couple of references for showing that 2 subspecies are endangered, but I can't find a reference for the species being endangered.

[1]
[2]

I believe that it is correct to remove the endangered list under the species, and explain the endangered status of subspecies below. Does this sound reasonable? Nereocystis 17:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes. Go for it. Thanks, -Willmcw 19:42, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dudleya virens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131218102848/http://www.crassulaceae.com/botanik/pflanzen/botspezies_seite_en.asp?main=133270&menu=1&bgt=cm&genus=DUDLEYA&gnr=1510 to http://www.crassulaceae.com/botanik/pflanzen/botspezies_seite_en.asp?main=133270&menu=1&bgt=cm&genus=DUDLEYA&gnr=1510

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]