Talk:The Mind's I

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Mind / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of mind
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Thought the article could use a rewrite, so went taking that "be bold" business to heart. Deleted some material that was better covered at Turing test and Chinese room, as well as other removed info that seemed more peripheral to the book than about the book itself, but I'll probably try to work the latter back in later unless someone else beats me to it. Mindspillage | spill your mind? 08:06, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It needs even more rewriting. It's still painful to read even for the interested reader. I couldn't get further than the second paragraph. Krum Stanoev 19:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a good article. I'd like to see a section about the book's reception with critics and its impact on philosophy and culture. --Gallusgallus (talk) 02:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]