User talk:Wnissen
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
Do sauterne and sauternes have different meanings? If so what are they? :) Kingturtle 00:58 17 May 2003 (UTC)
Chevy Chase perhaps, but Takoma Park?? -- it's on the opposite side of the county. BobCMU76
Regarding your change with the comment “Varietal is the adjective, variety the noun, fixing the grammar” — have a look at this definition. Seeing as it's not incorrect, it's shorter than “varietal wine,” and it's more specific than “variety” by itself, I much prefer varietal as a noun. It's also nice to have a one-word translation of fr:Cépage. Nathan 08:09, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing[edit]
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Champagne[edit]
Hi... I like your recent edit to Champagne. I've had some concerns about the state of the article (NPOV, muddled statements), and your edit does a good job of addressing them. I just wanted to point out that you accidentally added an incomplete sentence (and I'd like to see the end of it!). -- Coneslayer 14:38, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- However, companies like Korbel have been producing California Champagne for over a century and now ironically claim that their long tradition prevents them from .
- Criminy, I made that edit in the morning, so I can't even blame too much Champagne! Thanks for pointing that out. Wnissen 06:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
naturwein[edit]
Thanks for making it clear under QmP what naturwein was. Curiously I was at a tasting of old German wines (1945/1953/1959/1967/1971/1983/1990) and did wonder what this meant, as several bottles were labelled with this. I have been a bit slack on wine entries recently and will do some more work on them.... Justinc 00:46, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome. The terminology on German wines, even as codified in 1971, is baroque, and when you get wines from before that, it's practically impossible, even for Germans. The naturwein is the one thing I'm pretty sure I understand. And don't get me started on cabinet vs. kabinett, et al. Wnissen 02:00, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- well if you ever come to London, do let me know, we could discuss the whole cabinet thing... Justinc 02:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Pinot Noir[edit]
"NPOV'd a bit about Burgundy"? Why, sir, to allow remain an assertion that Burgundy produces the best Pinot is not only POV of the most heinous calibre, but an affront to every Californian and individual of good taste! ;) Collabi 03:10, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, no fair using hidden HTML comments, you sneak! I checked, and American pinot noir outnumbers Burgundy in the cellar seven to four, so it's obvious where my personal feelings are as far as regular drinking. However, I have yet to hear anyone who's sampled the best of California and the best of Burgundy and settled on the former. Of course, being willing to pay hundreds of dollars a bottle for Burgundy has a strong self-selection effect for people who already really like Burgundy... Wnissen 13:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
Philips Phile[edit]
Prove it's not a neutral and relevant edit and I'll stop. So far, you haven't proved anything, except to cite it's "too long." It's a neutral edit, if you re-read it you WILL see that great pain was taken to ensure that it was reported solely based on FACT, not by anything else. It was a far more major incident then a one-line sentence can cover. And I get it, no more then three edits to an article in a day, sheesh, should edit that down to a one line sentence.
- The entire paragraph is filled with loaded and accusatory words. You want to discuss the article, do it on the talk page. I added a note to your Talk page because the Wikipedia requires a multiple notifications before users are blocked from editing. Also, I can tell who you are, but please sign your posts using four ~ characters so that they are "signed." Wnissen 01:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
It had nothing to do with anonymous-type edits, though I did forget. Whoops, lol. Regardless, you point out the words, and I'll change them. That simple. Don't delete the whole article because of a few words, do some actual revision, tell me what they are, and I'll do my best to change them. Payneos 03:47, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Blanking of Cannes Lions International Advertising Festival[edit]
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Francs2000 
16:38, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, Didn't realize that I couldn't remove the article by blanking the vandalism. I see you've already deleted it, which is what I was trying to do. Thank you for taking care of this, I'll use {db} template thingy in the future. Wnissen 17:51, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Antibes[edit]
Thanks for noticing, and fixing, the removal of cited sources from Antibes by 84.66.237.254. --Nantonos 12:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- No problem at all. My wife and I spent the first few days of our honeymoon there, and it's always had a fond place in my heart, so I keep an eye on the article. Wnissen 15:01, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for sending the helpful information and guidance, which I appreciate. David Justin
Thank you[edit]
Thanks for the help (there's a lot to learn) and the encouragement. David Justin 18:40, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, again![edit]
I really appreciate your supportive kind words. I'll have to figure out how to add stubs and also subject categories; ventured there once unsuccessfully. I don't like to make unnecessry work for others.David Justin 18:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- I would recommend completely ignoring categories, links, and all the Wiki-specific stuff. Let the Wiki experts take care of that stuff, they don't need wine knowledge and they're way better at it than you or I. (As an example, I accidentally put the stub statement at the top of ten of your new pages and had to go back and fix them all.) Content is the key, and you are providing it in spades. Wnissen 21:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
What a relief[edit]
Oh, good. It's a relief to know that I don't need to learn all the technical skills....or feel guilty for not doing so.David Justin 02:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I seek your advice[edit]
Hi. I earlier posted a brief review of the reseach literature titled "Alcohol and Teenagers' Brains." about which three was some discussion. It was subsequently deleted, apparently because it was seen as original research.
I then revised the piece slightly under the title "Alcohol and young brains" and put this note on the discussion page:
Please note: This entry does not constitute original research according to Wikipedia guidelines:
“Original research that creates primary sources is not allowed. However, research that consists of collecting and organizing information from existing primary and/or secondary sources is strongly encouraged. In fact, all articles on Wikipedia should be based on information collected from primary and secondary sources. This is not ‘original research,’ it is ‘source-based research,’ and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia.”
Thank you.David Justin 21:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alcohol_and_young_brains"
I now discover that it was deleted without any comment or explanation whatsoever. What are my options and what would you recommend?
I really appreciate any help you can provide.David Justin 21:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Good Morning, David Justin. The article was listed for deletion and that was the result. You can read the debate at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alcohol_and_Teenage_Brains
It was deleted without debate (i.e., via speedy deletion) the second time around because it was a repost of an already deleted article. Let me first say that I don't agree with the result of the deletion; several participants said the content should be merged into Alcohol, which is not a bad idea, but no one did so and the article was deleted anyway. You might try listing it for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review but reposting the article will not work. Wnissen 15:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Thats for the useful advice, which I'll follow.David Justin 17:56, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Howdy, I've noticed your work on several wine articles, including Pinot Noir and would like to invite you to join the Wikipedia WineProject. One of the task that we are currently trying to do is get Pinot Noir up to Feature Article status. We would love to have you on the Team. :) Agne 10:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I just left a message on the Commandaria talk page [1]. I noticed you have contributed to the article and was hoping on your view on a proposal I have. Thanks, Georgeg 00:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
New Wine Discussion (by Agne) : Input Requested[edit]
Dear Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wine member:
There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wine#Vintage_Infos_.28part_II.29 that has become
Please add your comments/input to the talk page Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_is_not_a_wine_guide.
Thanks! Regards -- Steve.Moulding 19:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
 Issue I - February 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
|
Issue II - March 4th, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
|
Issue III - March 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
|
Issue IV - April 1st, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
|
The Wine Project Newsletter! Issue V - April 15, 2007 |
|
| This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. |
Wine Project Newsletter[edit]
|
|
The Wine Project Newsletter! Issue VI - May 6th, 2007 |
|
In this edition:
|
| This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. |
Apologies to everyone for this notification being sent out so late, events in real life prevented me from distributing it at the time, and the Wine Project's had a bit of a lull during the Northern Hemsiphere summer. But as the nights draw in, activity should pick up again, and hopefully the next Newsletter will arrive a little more quickly....
The next few weeks are the perfect time to take photos of grapes in the Northern Hemisphere - get your cameras out! FlagSteward 15:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project activity[edit]
This is a friendly note to let you know that you have been moved to the Inactive members page of the Wine Project. Users are moved to this page when two months have passed without any Wikipedia activity or 3 months have passed without any contribution to a wine related article. The intent of the Participant list is to function as a resource for other editors wishing to get in contact with wine project members for comments or question on Wikipedia's wine article. The goal of this process is to try and maintain the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Participants as current and up to date as possible with active and contributing members. Please note that this is not intended to be a negative reflection on your Wikipedia or wine related contribution and it is well known that sometimes outside life can take editors away from Wikipedia for some time. You will always be welcomed to rejoined the Wine Project should you feel that the time is right. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk or on the Wine Project talk page. Best wishes. AgneCheese/Wine 00:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ruby Hill Winery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Geoffrey Colvin[edit]
A tag has been placed on Geoffrey Colvin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Truthanado (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Wnissen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Wnissen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Wnissen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived[edit]
|
Hi Wnissen! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Marti Gould Cummings (July 29)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marti Gould Cummings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marti Gould Cummings, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Wnissen!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
San Francisco Microscopical Society[edit]
Hi! I saw your draft User:Wnissen/San Francisco Microscopical Society in a Twitter thread, and I checked newspapers.com for potential sources, in case these are helpful to you: 1906, 1949, 1954. Dreamyshade (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, sweet, thank you! I don't remember why I didn't publish, I will try to get around to it. Wnissen (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Egeria, West Virginia[edit]
It's still not a very long article, but I took your edit summary as a challenge and doubled its size. There turned out to be quite a few local sources about Egeria from the 1950s. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 16:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Woot woot! I'm so glad. The usual 20th century donut hole strikes again! Do you pay for the newspapers.com subscription? Any other tips on finding those sources? A distant relative once ran the post office, which doubled as a general store, and was followed home by the revenuers when she bought sugar in bulk to sell in Egeria. That's family lore, no wiki source, but it was interesting to me. Thanks for your contribution. Wnissen (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The article Reserve wine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced since '09. Nothing to prove notability. Subjective statements and OR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Enobong Anna Branch moved to draftspace[edit]
Thanks for your contributions to Enobong Anna Branch. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can I ask, in all kindness, if you are allowed to do this? She easily meets the standards of WP:PROF. To be the lead PI on a $3 million NSF grant is extremely, extremely prestigious, something like top 100 grants in the country. I didn't put a laundry list of the invited talks precisely because it wasn't core to her research but she is regularly a featured speaker. If you want to put the page up for deletion, please do so, to unilaterally move it back into a draft is not permitted, to my knowledge. If I'm wrong about that, please let me know. Wnissen (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Jamiebuba I added some honors. It is really hard to believe that a full professor at an R1, member of several committees, PI for a large grant, etc. does not qualify. She has 471 citations in the last five years. Is she a National Academy member? No. Is she clearly well above average as an academic? Yes. Look at the other people who gave the invited WST talk. A quarter of them are college presidents. Most of the rest are named chairs. I never heard of her until yesterday, I have never met her, but she's obviously top tier. If you have a suggestion about making it less promotional, I am all ears. Wnissen (talk) 01:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Enobong Anna Branch[edit]
Hello, Wnissen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enobong Anna Branch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)