This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This article reads like marketing; there's nothing informative or encyclopedic about the band. If I didn't know better I'd say it was a satire on modern music reviews. Vircum 04:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 06:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Band advertising, and rock journalims cannot be satirized, for all parodies are plausible. Geogre 13:56, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
