Talk:Baileys Harbor, Wisconsin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this be "Bailey's Harbor", with an apstrophe? Andy Mabbett 11:54, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)

No apostrophe gets more google hits (1600 v 130). --Jiang
Maybe, but that's no proof. Andy Mabbett 14:09, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
According to the official Door County and Baileys Harbor sites, there is no apostrophe. Brian Amos

No '[edit]

Baileys Harbor was named after Capt. Bailey, who was one of the earliest visitors and the "first" settler in the town. However, there is no apostrophy in the name.

Peter Jacobs, Town Supervisor, Baileys Harbor Wisconsin--209.62.168.106 21:51, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baileys Harbor, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cana Island size correction[edit]

I just made an edit to the Cana Island page. The previously stated size of the island (at over 8 square miles) seemed gargantuanly wrong, given the photographs I have seen of the island. I used Google Maps to estimate it, and from what I saw, Cana Island was just under 750 feet wide from West-East, which was its largest dimension for area, which would mean that it is less than .02 miles. If there are any knowledgeable locals who can provide more accurate information, please be my guest and make a correction. Please leave a message on my talk page if you need any technical help with that. QuakerIlK (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC) (edited to correct simple mistake) QuakerIlK (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]