User talk:Robojames

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello Robojames, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax τεχ 15:40, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chase, Richard Brian[edit]

An article being vanity does not make it a candidate for speedy deletion. I suggest listing Chase, Richard Brian on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion instead. -- Cyrius|✎ 16:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism research[edit]

Thanks for the round up. It's going to take awhile for me to check all that. I'll get to you later. Mgm|(talk) 20:33, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Please do not cut and paste move[edit]

as you just did to move the content of General Motors Electro-Motive Division to Electro-Motive Diesels. It loses article history which is essential to keep. Besides, I am not sure there is consensus for such a move. Some have suggested that the new company should have its own, separate article, leaving General Motors Electro-Motive Division to cover the historical aspects. Or maybe it should exist at EMD? —Morven 19:59, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

  • I didn't think it was a big deal. This page seems pretty dead, it needs work

RE: Fatsak[edit]

He's a real person, whose exploits are both funny and surrealistic. Honestly, the guy can write and tell a story and is worthy of inclusion.

Image:Cdn_nickel.jpg[edit]

No problem wtih a replacement, I just cropped that one from Montrealais' image to illustrate Beaver in a hurry one day. Glad to see a better image. Radagast 15:41, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

British Museum[edit]

I realise that there's nothing more likely to polarise opinion and ignite a flame war than the Elgin Marbles and sympathise with anyone who tries write about them without bias, but I feel that some of your deletions in the volatile 'Criticisms' section may have detracted from the article a little. Your edit has made the Elgin Marbles and Benin Bronzes out to be two objects, but they're two groups of sculptures. By removing the statement 'the expertise and desire to preserve the items are now more widespread' the argument given by the article for their return seems less qualified.

Also, what is your objection to the sentence 'The debate over the legitimacy of the British Museum's claims over many of its artifacts continues, with the Museum claiming an inalienable right to hold them under British law, and critics accusing it of theft and inconsiderateness', not POV either way as far as I can tell? – Ham 20:23, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your latest edit, bringing those arguments back but rephrasing them. That section's getting along nicely now. – Ham 15:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Hi James. You nominated Image:UnknownDevice.jpg for deletion, saying it is "useless". You might like to check out the Wikimedia Commons, a database of free images. Images uploaded there can be used on any language Wikipedia. And photos are useful there even if they aren't used in Wikipedia articles. I've moved your picture to Commons:Image:Pot gripper.jpg, and added it to Commons:Category:Kitchen utensils. dbenbenn | talk 30 June 2005 14:52 (UTC)

Qatar[edit]

Thanks for your answer at WP:RD about Qatar. I am grateful. PedanticallySpeaking July 8, 2005 20:47 (UTC)

Canadian coin images[edit]

How did you take such nice photos? I tried taking a photo of a 2004 dime. They are now incorporated into the Dime (Canadian coin) page, since they are an improvement over the older version. However, I had trouble getting a close enough photo while still keeping everything in focus, not too dark, not too much glare. As you can see, my dime photo isn't really a success, especially the obverse. Do you have any tricks? thirty-seven 11:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Holmes[edit]

Greetings! You have edited the Katie Holmes page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Wolf Template[edit]

Hmm we have wp attack... but I like the idea of a sort of wolf template for people who bite newbies. I read about your idea in your post on don't bite the newbies {{nobite}}

Image copyright problem with Image:Cdn-nickel-obverse.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cdn-nickel-obverse.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Toonie-reverse.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Toonie-reverse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. §hep • Talk 02:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Toonie-obverse2004.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Toonie-obverse2004.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. §hep • Talk 02:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toonie-obverse2004.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toonie-obverse2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robojames&oldid=1051584228"