Talk:Sufjan Stevens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian themes - original research[edit]

IMO this whole section is really running afoul of WP:NOR. Apparently one editor decides to come up with novel interpretations to emphasize Stevens' lyrics in relation to Christianity; then a second editor decides to balance the content to deemphasize it; and round and round we go. Any interpretation of the lyrics aside from the trivially obvious constitutes original research. Some basic Christian references are probably just too obvious to ignore, and the same might be the case of other sorts of references. But attempts to piece together a picture of Stevens' faith or lack thereof belong in someone's doctoral thesis, not in a Wikipedia article. Please support these very soon with published sources (the citation for "Lord God Bird" is duly noted and should be preserved) or I plan to revert them, regardless of whether they're seen as pro-Christian or pro-secularism or whatever. Cheers, PhilipR 05:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I nearly gutted the subsection yesterday, but thought twice for some reason. I agree completely, it's nearly all original research. Frankly, I wouldn't be opposed to removing everything but the first paragraph or so (and the Lord God Bird blurb). Everything else is unreferenced. · j e r s y k o talk · 14:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree As I said above: I'm not sure the in-depth analysis of every Christian metaphor presented in his songs is needed to be posted on this page. (including biblical references, etc.) It just seems to take things way to far for this wiki page? Any other thoughts? I suggest keeping it simple with a couple quotes and perhaps a brief stance on his religious position. I would go as far to delete it. Onishenko 20:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree too! But can't we find a reputable 3rd-party source analyzing some of this? Dybryd 04:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unsure isn't it obvious that his lyrics are jam packed with Christian references, though? i can pick out waaaay more than was posted on the wiki page. that's just the tip of the iceberg User:claydoc 18:15, 23 December 2006
Of course, but it's not the place of Wikipedia editors to do original interpretive work -- even making explicit what seems to be clearly implied. That's WP:OR There must be a third-party source writing about this we could quote, though. Dybryd 23:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The section is rambling and collegiate. But Sufjan's Christian themes are very important to his music, and should definitely have a section, so there needs to be something like a summary with references and a couple of more-direct lyrics.Yours etc. 01:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor point - I was just checking reference 6 in the main article, and I can't see the quote in this article in the referenced text at all. Could someone either correct me, or the article?Shahid1618 15:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the AV article is pretty clear that he attends an Anglican church. While this doesn't mean he is a Christian, it seem pretty significant. Amandamae 23:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it means he's a Christian, silly buns. --?

As a former Christian, it most certainly does not mean he is a Christian. I even lead worship music for Christian groups for old times' sake once or twice after I left the faith, so do keep yourself from making presumptions.79.176.242.243 (talk) 23:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparisons[edit]

The comparison to Guaraldi I removed relied on this sentence from Amazon.com: "Illinois sounds like The Sea and Cake collaborating with the high-school band from a Wes Anderson film on banjo-driven, pulsing meditations on Vince Guaraldi's music for Peanuts." PuerExMachina 06:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, add it back in and footnote it if you wish. I wouldn't have made the Guaraldi/Stevens comparison but it's published by a semi-reliable source. (I think Amazon's reviews come from somewhere else though.) If you have problems footnoting it just put the URL in single brackets [http://amazon.com] and someone will help. Regards, PhilipR 23:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it because I don't think that quote actually compares Sufjan's music to Guaraldi's music. The quote has to be taken as a whole to make any sense; even then, I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense, at least not enough to warrant inclusion in the article. PuerExMachina 08:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, keep it out. Faithlessthewonderboy 02:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maple River[edit]

The song title "Maple River" almost certainly refers to the Maple River (which has several branches) in Emmet County, Michigan, where Sufjan grew up. There are four other Maple Rivers listed in Wikipedia, but this one makes the most sense.69.145.37.174 05:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok I've sorted that out and referred to the many states with Maple Rivers in them. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fifty States Project[edit]

I removed the sentence 'There have been other times Stevens has said he does not really plan to make an album for every state, specifically listing Texas as a state he will "probably never do."!Do not put references on discussion page!' due to the fact that the quote seems to be lifted from this article, in which Sufjan actually says that he is "definitely not going to do a record about Texas birds or Florida birds." Techpeace 19:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the German Wikipedia [[1]] states in Article and Discussion pages that Sufjan stated in several interviews, that the "50 States" project was meant as a joke (no sources cited though).--83.77.183.229 (talk) 18:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of His First Name[edit]

I don't know how to properly write (in IPA technical terms) the pronunciation of Sufjan Stevens' first name but I do know its 'soof-yahn'. (See this article for proof.) Basically, I don't think the Wikipedia article has it right. 'Suf-jan' is not how you pronounce his name. So can someone who knows the IPA style correctly write the pronunciation of his name? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.212.8.44 (talk) 08:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, we know it's soof-yahn, and the IPA symbols are correct. The "j" in IPA is a "y" sound, as it is in the majority of European languages. Thanks for asking, though! -- Dhartung | Talk 09:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected the IPA. It said [soof yahn] and that cannot be correct. I've looked at the "transcription" of the pronunciation at the website above. I haven't heard his name pronounced myself, but the present transcription seems more correct than the previous. Please correct if it is wrong. NisseSthlm 23:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't Soof-yahn be correct? That sounds exactly correct, to me... Unless I'm missing some very minor detail, like you not liking the 'h' in that transcription, your correction likely messed up the correct IPA based on what I read. I don't read IPA, though, so I'm not sure. Someone check? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.242.243 (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Casimir Pulaski Day[edit]

Why does the article say that Illinois' celebration of Casimir Pulaski Day is confusing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.85.81.39 (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation?[edit]

Quoting the Article (emphasis mine): "Casimir Pulaski Day" speaks of "All the glory that the Lord has made" in the midst of personal pain and loss, while also noting the limitations of personal faith, singing, "Tuesday night at the Bible study, we lift our hands and pray over your body but nothing ever happens."

That's some odd wording. Deciding what he is noting (that his faith is "limited") is speculation into this quote; who is to say that it isn't a statement of one time his "personal faith" failed him? Or that it's denouncing christianity altogether? Or that he's not making a theological statement on whether or not healing is possible?

Or that it's sarcasm? Or any other number of ridiculous things?

I vote we drop the (again) speculation.Lackinglatin 07:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that all such inferences should be removed unless reliable sources are provided. –Pomte 07:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removing, as there has been no opposition against the proposed action. Lackinglatin 17:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sufjan is also a creative writing major. Many of his songs you will notice are just stories through someone's eyes - not necessarily his. E.g. Wasps of the Palisades is through the eyes of a female. Therefore any attempts to read into Sufjan through his lyrics is conjecture. Jwigton 07:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1st paragraph[edit]

Starts off well but then tries to cram it all in . I propose to split in tw2 ... just before "His music has been likened to ..." . Will do now ... if you don't like it, well, come up with something better203.211.102.217 08:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead now has "beginning", "music" and "50 states" sections. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two Faced?[edit]

"Two Faced John McCartney created "Zombies Walk!!", a mashup of "They Are Night Zombies!! They Are Neighbors!! They Have Come Back From The Dead!! Ahhhhh!" and Kanye West's "Jesus Walks"." - This quote is found under Allusions - is this correct or vandalism? Dh42 02:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it's not very notable. CAN 03:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You can hear it on this MySpace page, but I also suggest that unless Two Faced John McCartney rates a Wikipedia page the mash-up doesn't need to be included in the article. -MrFizyx 18:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


'it's not so cold in texas' section.[edit]

that little section is ridiculous (is unsourcable, non-academic, and the entire premise of it is opinion) , so i'm getting rid of it. aeymxq 13:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"lyrically focused and instrumentally rich"[edit]

yeah that doesnt sound biased at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.182.76.37 (talk) 02:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois[edit]

according to itunes, the Illinois record is actually called Illinoise. But can someone change it? I dunno how —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.211.192.79 (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Its not - see archive 1 for discussion. Illinois is the correct title.--Fresh 17:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That would make sense, sorta, if the cover art for the album didn't have a big orange "E" on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Symmerhill (talk • contribs) 11:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cover art states: Sufjan Stevens invites you to come on feel the illinoise. This is a reference to a track in the Album. According to the Asthmatic Kitty record label website (Sufjan's label), the album is titled Illinois. itunes is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.231.151 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Anyone interested about more images could see http://www.flickr.com/photos/tammylo/ right now. gren グレン 04:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pronunciation of name[edit]

I think its worth providing a non-IPA pronunciation of Sufjan's name for the people who don't know how to read IPA. 128.255.134.97 (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (pronunciation). faithless (speak) 23:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that there was a link to a pronunciation guide. That resolves my issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.211.10.234 (talk) 13:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New template[edit]

What do people think? I know that single looks very lonely but i'm sure he'll do another one soon! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is cool. I hadn't realised he'd only released one single from all those albums! -- Naerii 01:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Illinoise[edit]

Why are all the Sufjan pages again infested with references to an album called "Illinoise"? SIGH! I've corrected all (I think) of the ones on the main page, but if anyone spots any others could they change it? Thanks x User:Guntrip 26 May '08

Check out the changes that User:E-Kartoffel made from 13:06, 23 May 2008 to 13:35, 23 May 2008 (about 40 changes). Or you can do a content search on Illinoise. I vote for a complete rollback of all of these changes. --EPadmirateur (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just checking again: is it the consensus of editors here that the album is Illinois and that track 3 has the title "Come on Feel the Illinoise"? If so, it won't take long to revert the earlier edits. --EPadmirateur (talk) 03:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed there was consensus on Illinois but now someone's changed it i agree with the change. If you see the front cover it has a very large Illinoise across it (that being the shortened form of it's full name Come On Feel The Illinoise). Bear in mind it is not like Michigan which has the state's unaltered name blazoned on the album. Personally i've never spoken with anyone about it as "Illinois". However asthmatic kitty [2] lists it as Illinois and pitchfork's review is of "Illinois". I lean towards Illinoise personally but more authoritative sources seem to favour Illinois Sillyfolkboy (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While I'll agree the front cover causes confusion (and with merit), as you've said the Asmatic Kitty website refers to it as Illinois, as does the spine of the record. Besides, if the front cover is to be taken as a correct source, the title should be Sufjan Stevens invites you to: Come On Feel The Illinoise!, so just Illinoise isn't even a correct wrong answer! ;) x User:Guntrip 30 May '08 —Preceding comment was added at 13:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed then. I'll revert that last edit to the page as it appears there's general consensus on the matter. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

I consolidated the disorganized discography, fixed the hierarchy of the biography, removed the "notes" from the discography, which belong on each albums pages, and removed a source without that isn't referenced. Not much to discuss. Cosprings (talk) 12:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New album[edit]

The new album will be called "the age of adz"

https://www.scdistribution.com/sufjan/index.php?cat=AKR77cd&format=CD

sounds a lot like a "kid a" version of sufjan 8P --Idonthavetimeforthiscarp (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

Discography The discography should be split into Sufjan Stevens discography. I can simply copy-and-paste, of course, but if anyone wants to go about finding citations and formatting it, that would be nice, too. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, most other artists on wikipedia have a separate page for discography. I would be more than willing to help with the transition. Klsmn22 (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.72.97 (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Split it. I'll help format it at some point. I've done quite a few discography edits. Adam2201 (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree, this would be very helpful. (bricktor) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bricktor (talk • contribs) 02:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Illness?[edit]

Stevens revealed in an interview with Eclaim! that he had been battling a "confusing and mysterious" illness which forced him to take a break from recording. I would edit this myself, but I don't trust my HTML skills. Here's the link: http://exclaim.ca/News/sufjan_stevens_discusses_his_serious_issues —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.153.226.68 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that there's enough information on this to put it up just yet. I would wait for more information from a more reliable and reputable source. Klsmn22 (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like an excellent source for anyone wanting to add in this topic. http://stereogum.com/553642/sufjan-reveals-health-issues-has-career-best-sales-week/news/ Klsmn22 (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for the numerous edits to the talk page. It appears that the information included in the Stereogum article is all original to the Exclaim (not Eclaim) article mentioned at the top of this topic. I merely overlooked some of the direct quotes in the Exclaim article from Stevens. It would appear that this information is legitimate. It should probably be added somewhere in the Age of Adz section. Klsmn22 (talk) 05:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a short paragraph in the Age of Adz section based on the refs above. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexual Themes[edit]

Under the "Themes" section of the article shouldn't there be reference to the homosexual themes that are found in many of Stevens' songs? I'm pretty sure there have been a few reputable sources that have discussed this. A Laughton (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree. I could've sworn he had announced in an interview somewhere that he was gay, but seeing as I came here for clarification...who knows? Coriander (talk) 03:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Christmas album[edit]

There is a strong speculation that Sufjan is releasing yet another Christmas album. http://pitchfork.com/news/47853-is-sufjan-stevens-making-a-new-christmas-record/ Pohetri (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant information in 'Early life'[edit]

The last two paragraphs of the 'Early life' section have nothing to do with Stevens' early life (apart from the little 'while in school...' bit); where should I move them to? MatthewLaw1 (talk) 22:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Songs[edit]

Sufjan is becoming a very prominent, influential, and critically acclaimed artist. More of his songs should have their own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.23.143.198 (talk) 02:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confused with Cat Stevens?[edit]

Anyone else think this singer was Cat Stevens at first? Given his folky sound, popularity in the Indie scene, and similar name (considering Cat Stevens is now called Yusuf Islam, given some research concerning what I should have already known) I instantly took to thinking this was Cat Stevens recording new(er) music. Stupid mistake, or does this happen with any sort of frequency? --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 10:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sufjan Stevens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sufjan Stevens/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Took this to B class, because I believe it is a pretty good background on Sufjan Stevens and his works, but lacks a lot on his early life, and could be expanded and written better. If you have any other ideas, please let me know your thoughts.--Fresh 21:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 07:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Sufjan Stevens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fifty States Project "finished"[edit]

"I Can't Believe It's Not Sufjan Stevens: Local musicians finish the 50 States project" Since this music is not by nor apparently endorsed by the original artist, I'm not sure if it belongs in his article, but it seems notable. Mapsax (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it time to include a portion on sexuality in the personal life or themes sections?[edit]

I'm sure this has been brought up multiple times here (I can see at least one instance in 2013), but I think there might be enough information available to justify a brief paragraph or two on Sufjan Stevens' relationship with LGBT-related issues and themes. I understand how this can be a dicey subject, especially because, to my knowledge, he has not claimed any particular label with regard to sexual orientation. But, at this point, he has all but acknowledged that "The Predatory Wasp of the Palisades..." was about a juvenile romantic encounter with another boy (as was "Venus" on Planetarium, which he was promoting in that 2017 article linked above). He has been connected to LGBT-related projects, and I would argue that the identification of LGBT themes in his music has become a key part of the online discourse surrounding his work and is an appealing feature to much of his current fanbase. Some of this is obviously not supportable outside of original research, but I wonder if the following could somehow be included in a sexuality section without breaking Wikipedia standards (sources below are obviously not cited in Wikipedia style; just there for quick reference):

  • Stevens has acknowledged to having his first and "most profound" sexual experiences at a Methodist summer camp at about the age of 16. He described the experience as an "awakening," and also indicated that he was introduced to new views about gender during that time, specifically the idea that God is not male. Stevens has confirmed that his songs "Venus" and "The Predatory Wasp of the Palisades," the latter of which uses male pronouns in describing a romantic encounter, are about experiences at that summer camp.
  • Stevens contributed to the soundtrack of "Call Me By Your Name," a film depicting a gay relationship. His song "Mystery of Love" for that film was nominated for an Oscar for best original song, and he performed it at the 90th Oscars.
  • During Pride Month 2019, he released two songs, "Love Yourself," and "With My Whole Heart," and Pride-related merchandise, donating some of the proceeds to LGBT-related organizations.
  • Though Stevens has not addressed his sexuality publicly, Pitchfork Slate has noted that "many fans have claimed Stevens for the queer canon," and some of the online discourse surrounding his music has focused on the tendency for his lyrics to lend themselves to various interpretations, either in describing a spiritual relationship with God, or homosexual romantic experiences. This has sometimes manifested in meme-based commentary, such as can be seen in the Facebook group, "Is this Sufjan Stevens song gay or just about God?"

Again, not sure if it's appropriate, or if some of this would unavoidably run afoul of Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. I'm not as well versed in all of the ins and outs as more seasoned contributors are, which is why I'm just proposing it here and letting others determine if it's something worth adding down the line. Wemedgefrodis (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a lot of speculation. The examples you cited don't seem like enough to warrant inclusion. For example, he's released a religious album and talked specifically about religion numerous times and it's only covered in this article for a few sentences under themes. Obviously there's a market for everything on the internet, but I don't see how it's relevant enough for its own section in this article unless he's specifically discussed it himself. Until he says something on the topic, speculation about his personal life shouldn't be included. - Nemov (talk) 19:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be appropriate to include a sentence or two about music critics' analyses of queerness as a theme in some of his work. The speculation surrounding his sexuality, on the other hand, would be a violation of the BLP policy. KyleJoantalk 20:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That all makes complete sense. Thanks! And I want to be clear, I think each of the points I listed above function strictly as independent details under the broad umbrella of "Sufjan and LGBT issues." I don't mean to imply they all build on each other toward a singular conclusion such as "Sufjan gay" or "Sufjan's music is gay" (to put it informally). The participation in the CMBYN soundtrack and LGBT charities, for example, would by no means have to imply anything about his own sexuality, and it would be inappropriate for his Wikipedia article to suggest so — I fully admit that.
I suppose one of the thoughts I was interested in bringing forward is "at what point does an audience's particular relationship/identification with an artists' work become noteworthy in itself?" (for example, Judy Garland's status as a gay icon is clearly noteworthy enough to merit its own wikipedia article. James Dean's wikipedia page also includes a section on sexuality.) And, for the purposes of Wikipedia, surely the answer is "when there are enough reliable sources directly attesting to its noteworthiness." I'm happy to concede there's not enough of a connection there for Stevens at this point (and certainly nowhere near the noteworthiness of Garland or Dean). But, I do think there are more sources commenting on a connection now than there were ~5 years ago, so I thought I'd broach the subject if for no other reason than to establish that it's still inappropriate, and allow others to lay out some guidelines for when it might become appropriate.
Hope that all makes sense (and hopefully my bringing this topic up is at least somewhat helpful, rather than just being bothersome or unproductive). Wemedgefrodis (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of Sufjan[edit]

Can someone please delete the part about Sufjan’s name meaning “comes with the sword” in Armenian? It's not an Armenian name, and other, well known etymologies exist for others with this name, which comes from Islam (no widely used pan-Muslim names would come from Armenian, Armenians have been predominantly Christian since before Islam existed) I saw this claim reproduced on Facebook which led me to check the Wiki, and both sources in the Wiki go back to the same article if you check. I don’t know the process with updating articles and what is required to do it right. But this is so easy to research.

I’m not Armenian but I’ve been learning the language. I’ve seen several Armenians online (forums etc) express they think Sufjan was messing with the interviewer in the interview for the article that originates this claim. It’s clear that either Sufjan didn’t know at the time of the article that Armenia is a majority Christian country, or was testing the interviewer to see if they would notice this was part of his lie.

The word for sword in Armenian, FYI, is սուր ‘sur’. The suffix -յան ‘-yan’ does not mean “comes with” Keeping this claim in the article without at least changing the wording to something not only less credulous but that explicitly calls the statement into doubt reflects poorly both on Sufjan and on anyone who has put good time and energy into working on this. (“Stevens once claimed his name means …. however, this is clearly untrue, given that …”)


One more thing. A month ago there was no mention here of any Muslim figure who originated the name. Now there’s a mention of Abu Sufyan, who is not Armenian and whose name is not Armenian. But this probably is the origin of Sufjan's name, since he is an early feature in Islam. The meaning and etymology of Sufjan should be the same as Abu Sufyan's name.

There are a lot of people online that can be found with a search who will discuss this statement’s falseness. Just none from journalistic or scholarly sources, but in this case it shouldbe enough because the only original source for the claim is Sufjan’s interview. All it would take is showing this quote to a single native Armenian speaking editor]

Sorry I didn’t provide sources. I just wanted to start the discussion but if this goes nowhere in a few days I’ll try to add some. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.252.92.224 (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much to discuss without sources. WP:OR cannot be used to justify inclusion. Nemov (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revisting: Illness?[edit]

Hello from 2023, old 2010 OPs (if they're still on this page)

Recently, as in around an hour ago from me posting this, Sufjan on his tumblr revealed he has Guillain–Barré syndrome, GBS. :(.

https://sufjan.com/post/728984189887807488/hi-friends-quick-update-on-my-life-im-very

Hoping he's doing better with his team!! Ddelrio08 (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sufjan's Partner[edit]

Would it be appropriate to add details of his relationship with Evan Richardson? With the release of Javelin and his recent Tumblr post, it feels timely. Lorcanopolo (talk) 21:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sufjan_Stevens&oldid=1195538193"