Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immunocompromised
Immunocompromised was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect the article.
Sub-stub and vague. An interesting subject, but for now it should either be deleted or replaced by a redirect
to a page with some content. Delete. (vote replaced below) --Falsifian 00:36, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)
- I extracted the information therein and merged into immune system; I strongly plead for a redirect rather than deletion, for the term has numerous sensible and serious inward links, and is bound to get a redline from a medical article almost as soon as it'd be deleted anyway. Samaritan 03:05, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I'll change to Merge and redirect. I should have thought of immune system; sorry about that. --Falsifian 03:39, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect is fine, since we have a volunteer. I would note that we ought also to have a redirect at immuno-suppression, immunosuppression, immunosuppressed, immuno-suppressed, and immuno-compromised. Geogre 04:26, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I've redirected immuno-suppression and immunosuppressed and immuno-suppressed to immunosuppression, which was already extant, and immuno-compromised to immune system. Samaritan 05:57, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- At deletion time, instead of deleting, replace its text by #REDIRECT [[immune system]] . Anthony Appleyard 10:31, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect. Axl 11:47, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- What the hell is liver dialysis? Redirect to immunosuppression. JFW | T@lk 14:35, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.